09.04.2013 Views

Astronautics and Aeronautics, 1967 - NASA's History Office

Astronautics and Aeronautics, 1967 - NASA's History Office

Astronautics and Aeronautics, 1967 - NASA's History Office

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

July 9 ASTRONAUTICS AND AERONAUTICS, <strong>1967</strong><br />

program, assuming the sonic boom is intolerable over populated areas.<br />

. . . The only thing that is involved here is whether we sell more aircraft,<br />

not whether the program is a success. . . .” Even if SST were limited to<br />

subsonic flight over inhabited areas at least 300 aircraft could be sold<br />

initially, he said, <strong>and</strong> market studies indicated “that there is a possibility<br />

of going up to 1,200 aircraft by 1990.” (Transcript, 41, 294, 942)<br />

0 NATO had begun to modernize its communications network by using com-<br />

sats, Clyde H. Farnsworth reported in the New York Times. Initial<br />

$900,000 test phase of project had been inaugurated by Supreme Allied<br />

Comm<strong>and</strong>er in Europe Gen. Lyman L. Lemnitzer in a transmission from<br />

his headquarters in Casteau, Belgium, to Naples, Italy, via one of DOD’S<br />

15 Initial Defense Communications Satellite Project (IDCSP) satellites.<br />

US., which had proposed the NATO project, was permitting NATO to use<br />

the IDCSP satellites temporarily. Following approval of the second phase<br />

of the project, $45 million-of which US. would pay 25%-would be<br />

spent to link 12 alliance countries via two 100-lb cornsats owned by<br />

NATO <strong>and</strong> launched by USAF into synchronous orbits over the Atlantic.<br />

Two ground stations would be in US. <strong>and</strong> one in each NATO country<br />

except France (who had not been invited to participate in the project),<br />

Luxembourg, <strong>and</strong> Icel<strong>and</strong>. (Farnsworth, NYT, 7/9/67, 17)<br />

July 10: Chicago Daily News urged House/Senate Conference Committee on<br />

NASA FY 1968 authorization bill to accept Rep. Donald Rumsfeld’s (R-<br />

Ill.) proposals to establish an independent safety review board <strong>and</strong> to<br />

require NASA to keep Congress fully informed on its operations [see<br />

June 281: “There is ampIe justification for these requirements.<br />

“Part of it can be found in the sc<strong>and</strong>alous record of fumbling, bum-<br />

bling <strong>and</strong> pure carelessness unearthed in the investigation of the blazing<br />

death of three [Apollo] astronauts . . . [<strong>and</strong> part from] the perils of<br />

an alliance between big government <strong>and</strong> the big industries that serve<br />

it <strong>and</strong> profit by its contracts.<br />

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!