09.04.2013 Views

Astronautics and Aeronautics, 1967 - NASA's History Office

Astronautics and Aeronautics, 1967 - NASA's History Office

Astronautics and Aeronautics, 1967 - NASA's History Office

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

ASTRONAUTICS AND AERONAUTICS, <strong>1967</strong> Jdy 7<br />

Hawaii earth stations. Fixed-price contracts proposed included<br />

$7,600,000 to Philco-Ford Corp. for four antenna subsystems ;<br />

$4,500,000 to Raytheon Co. for four ground communications equipment<br />

subsystems ; <strong>and</strong> $1,015,000 to Cutler-Hammer, Inc., for four low-noise<br />

receiver subsystems. Construction on three new earth stations <strong>and</strong> expan-<br />

sion of facilities at Hawaii station were expected to begin in late <strong>1967</strong>.<br />

(ComSatCorp Release 67-36)<br />

0 H. Frank Hann became Director of the Financial Management Div., <strong>Office</strong><br />

of Administration, NASA Hq. He had been Acting Director since April 3.<br />

(NASA Ann, 7/12/67)<br />

Jdy 8-9: The <strong>1967</strong> Soviet air show-first in six years-was held at Domode<br />

dovo Airport near Moscow. Program included aerial displays <strong>and</strong> ground<br />

exhibits of seven new types of supersonic jet fighters, including one<br />

VTOL <strong>and</strong> two variable-sweep-wing aircraft similar to US. F-111 ; Proton<br />

<strong>and</strong> Vostok spacecraft; World War I1 fighters; <strong>and</strong> four-engine IL-62<br />

commercial aircraft. U.S.S.R. claimed that its new variable-sweep-wing<br />

models-a fighter <strong>and</strong> a missile launcher-were first <strong>and</strong> lightest in the<br />

world <strong>and</strong> could fly at mach 1 at sea level <strong>and</strong> mach 2 at higher altitudes.<br />

New VTOL aircraft was reportedly capable of rising vertically 130-160<br />

ft before beginning forward flight. Western sources speculated that<br />

absence of any large new bombers suggested that U.S.S.R., like US., was<br />

concentrating on versatile missile-launching aircraft which had long-<br />

range striking power. (Reuters, NYT, 7/9/67, 17; W Post, 7/10/67,<br />

A10; Av Wk, 7/24/67,38--44)<br />

Jdy 9: USN decision to study a ship-based antimissile missile system [see<br />

July 31 was praised by Hanson Baldwin in the New York Times. “Stra-<br />

tegically <strong>and</strong> tactically the role of the Navy has been transformed by the<br />

nuclear age; the depths of the sea, the space above the atmosphere <strong>and</strong><br />

every part of every l<strong>and</strong> mass on earth are now accessible to modern naval<br />

power.” Proposed SABMIS system would be especially effective because:<br />

(1) nuclear submarines’ ability to remain completely submerged indefi-<br />

nitely gave them unequaled defense invulnerability ; (2) submarine-<br />

launched ballistic missile would draw enemy attack toward seas rather<br />

than toward populated l<strong>and</strong> as l<strong>and</strong>-based missiles do; (3) sea-based<br />

system would be more effective against enemy missile containing several<br />

warheads, each capable of maneuvering along different trajectory ; <strong>and</strong><br />

(4) system would be able to intercept enemy missiles in midcourse,<br />

rather than terminal phase. (Baldwin, NYT, 7/9/67)<br />

Effect of sonic boom on SST flight routes <strong>and</strong> sales prospects was discussed<br />

by Secretary of Transportation Alan S. Boyd, FAA Administrator William<br />

F. McKee, <strong>and</strong> Director of SST Development BJG J. C. Maxwell (USAF,<br />

Ret.) in May <strong>and</strong> June testimony released by House Committee on<br />

Appropriations’ Subcommittee on the Dept. of Transportation. Condi-<br />

tions under which supersonic flight would be permitted over populated<br />

l<strong>and</strong> areas had still not been determined, Gen. Maxwell explained. “The<br />

available sonic boom data indicate that the present SST design may<br />

possibly be restricted from supersonic operations over populated l<strong>and</strong><br />

areas . . . [<strong>and</strong> we] have based our SST program decisions on the con-<br />

servative assumption that this design will be operated primarily on<br />

water.”<br />

DOT did not have to force the American public to tolerate sonic booms<br />

to make SST program an economic success, Secretary Boyd assured the<br />

Committee. “We are satisfied that we can have a . . . highly successful<br />

203

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!