09.04.2013 Views

Astronautics and Aeronautics, 1967 - NASA's History Office

Astronautics and Aeronautics, 1967 - NASA's History Office

Astronautics and Aeronautics, 1967 - NASA's History Office

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

April 18 ASTRONAUTICS AND AERONAUTICS, <strong>1967</strong><br />

bC . . . in each of . . . [the] problem areas we identified in December<br />

1965, we found . . . improvement in the situation in April 1966. I do<br />

not intend, however, to leave the impression that we were completely<br />

satisfied with North American’s performance. We did determine . . .<br />

that the corrective actions already taken <strong>and</strong> those in the process of being<br />

implemented in April 1966 were appropriate ones that reflected a respon-<br />

sive reaction by NAA to the criticism we had expressed during our review<br />

<strong>and</strong> provided some measure of confidence for improved future<br />

performance. . . .”<br />

Testifying in support of NASA’s FY 1968 budget, Webb warned against<br />

permitting the Jan. 27 Apollo accident to deter US. space efforts. It<br />

should not, he said, “lead us to lose sight of the continued progress<br />

<strong>and</strong> vigorous efforts the Soviets are making. . . . With the world<br />

situation what it is, <strong>and</strong> with clear indications that the Soviets are going<br />

ahead with a large-scale, long-term program in space, it is especially<br />

important this year for the United States to let the world know that we<br />

cannot <strong>and</strong> will not surrender our hard-won position, even though we will<br />

not mount the larger effort required to catch up with them.” Describing<br />

the proposed budget as “forward looking,” Webb conceded that it would<br />

not “enable us [NASA] to move toward important go& with as much<br />

assurance as we would like.” He outlined NASA’s planned program <strong>and</strong><br />

urged support for all future projects: “If we fail to make these decisions<br />

in our consideration of the 1968 budget, they will go by default. . . .<br />

Later when we find we do not have the capabilities we could have had <strong>and</strong><br />

that others are accomplishing what we might have achieved, it will be too<br />

late.” (Wood, W Post, 4/19/67, A9; Sehistedt, B Sun, 4/19/67, 1)<br />

NASA Nike-Cajun sounding rocket launched from Point Barrow, Alaska,<br />

carried c;sFc-instrumented grenade payload to obtain data on tempera-<br />

ture,.pressure, density, <strong>and</strong> wind between 22-59 mi (35-95 km) at<br />

transition from winter-time westerly to summer-time easterly circulation.<br />

Rocket <strong>and</strong> instrumentation performed satisfactorily. (NASA Rpt SRL)<br />

* Informed sources reported that U.S.S.R.’s Tu-144 supersonic transport<br />

would not be ready for the Paris International Air Show in May as UPI<br />

reported March 7 but would still fly before the Anglo-French Concorde<br />

<strong>and</strong> US. SST, according to AP. First test flight of Tu-144 would be in<br />

late <strong>1967</strong>. (AP, NYT, 4/19/67,73)<br />

April 19: First manned Apollo flight had been delayed at least one year by<br />

Jan. 27 fire at KSC, Dr. George E. Mueller, NASA Associate Administrator<br />

for Manned Space Flight, told Senate Committee on Aeronautical <strong>and</strong><br />

Space Sciences. He said he believed men could still l<strong>and</strong> on the moon<br />

by the original 1970 deadline “although the probability is lowered.”<br />

Dr. Mueller told the Committee that the replacement spacecraft for the<br />

first manned Apollo mission, which incorporated “all changes resulting<br />

from the findings of the Apollo accident investigation,” was on the<br />

assembly line at North American Aviation, Inc.’s plant in Downey,<br />

Calif. (AP, B Sun, 4/20/67)<br />

* USAF SV-5D lifting body vehicle was successfully launched from WTR by<br />

Atlas booster on reentry mission <strong>and</strong> telemetered excellent performance<br />

data. Vehicl-third of four in USAF’S Precision Recovery Including<br />

Maneuvering Entry (Prime) program-was second to perform pre-<br />

programmed crossrange maneuvers <strong>and</strong> first to be successfully recov-<br />

ered. First SV-5D vehicle was launched Dec. 21, 1%6, <strong>and</strong> lost when<br />

parachute malfunctioned during reentry; second, launched March 5, sank<br />

116

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!