09.04.2013 Views

Astronautics and Aeronautics, 1967 - NASA's History Office

Astronautics and Aeronautics, 1967 - NASA's History Office

Astronautics and Aeronautics, 1967 - NASA's History Office

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

August 17 ASTRONAUTICS AND AERONAUTICS, <strong>1967</strong><br />

objects” had ever been identified by air forces over U.S. or Canada:<br />

“There have been thous<strong>and</strong>s of reports about official air force st<strong>and</strong>s<br />

on UFOS from the widest variety of sources over the years-but so far<br />

as the comm<strong>and</strong> is aware, it never has been shown anything but natural<br />

atmospheric or astronomical phenomena or airborne objectebirds,<br />

insects, hardwareseen under unusual circumstances, or misinter-<br />

preted.’, (Thomis, C Trib, 8/18/67,1)<br />

August 18: House Committee on Appropriations reported $4.6-billion NASA<br />

N 1968 appropriation bill-$516.6 million less than NASA had requested<br />

<strong>and</strong> $282 million less than NASA N 1968 authorization bill (S. 12%).<br />

Committee said the bill was “less than would be recommended under<br />

less stringent fiscal circumstances,” but it would support “a viable space<br />

program, <strong>and</strong> one that is consistent with available resources.<br />

“The reductions . . . should in no respect be interpreted as an ex-<br />

pression of a lack of confidence in our space endeavors. . . .” Cuts<br />

included: (1) $50.5 million from Apollo program; (2) $154.7 million<br />

from AA program; (3) $27.5 million from Nuclear Rocket Program;<br />

(4) $37.7 million from Tracking <strong>and</strong> Data Acquisition; <strong>and</strong> (5) $71.5<br />

million from Voyager (funding eliminated). (NASA LAR VI/91; WSJ,<br />

8/21/67,4; O’Toole, W Post, 8/19/67, A4)<br />

0 First two Apollo spacesuits incorporating changes recommended by NASA’s<br />

Apollo 204 Review Board were scheduled to arrive at MSC in early Sep<br />

tember for thermo-vacuum <strong>and</strong> compatibility testing. New suit, desig-<br />

nated A-7L, was an im roved version of the original A-6L suit. Changes,<br />

primarily replacing B ammable materials with nonflammable or low-<br />

flammability materials, included substitution of: (1) Beta fabric, a<br />

nonflammable fiberglass cloth, for Nomex, a high-temperature nylon,<br />

in outside layer; (2) Nomex for a more flammable nylon inner layer;<br />

<strong>and</strong> (3) fire-resistant Kapton/Beta fiberglass insulation for aluminized<br />

Mylar-Dacron insulation. In addition to its greater fire-resistant prop-<br />

erties, spacesuit, which was white rather than blue, was more com-<br />

fortable <strong>and</strong> mobile than A-6L. It would be used in all manned Apollo<br />

missions during prelaunch <strong>and</strong> launch phases, <strong>and</strong> reentry. First pro-<br />

duction model of spacesuit, manufactured by International Latex Corp.’s<br />

Government <strong>and</strong> Industrial Div. under MSC contract, was scheduled for<br />

mid-October delivery. (NASA Release 67-222)<br />

* Rocket engine for Apollo service module’s propulsion system had been<br />

undergoing tests at Arnold Engineering Development Center during past<br />

31/2 years. Initially, engine performance was unknown; it would use an<br />

ablatively cooled thrust chamber <strong>and</strong> a high expansion ratio nozzle of<br />

thin metal <strong>and</strong> would operate at relatively low combustion chamber pres-<br />

sures. Initial tests were on configuration of engine’s fragile nozzles.<br />

Follow-on tests, for prequalification of engine combined with heavy<br />

duty replica of propellant tankage, had checked ballistic performance.<br />

Simulated high-altitude testing would lead to eventual man-rating of<br />

propulsion system. ( AEDC Release 67-212)<br />

0 NASA had awarded NAA’S Rocketdyne Div. a $l.g-million contract for con-<br />

tinued technological investigation of the advanced aerospike rocket en-<br />

gine. Studied by OAET for 1% yrs, the engine utilizes a doughnut-<br />

shaped combustion chamber which discharges exhaust gases against the<br />

surface of a short center cone. In conventional rocket engines, gases are<br />

exp<strong>and</strong>ed inside long bell-shaped nozzles. Current concept specified an<br />

engine 8 ft in diameter <strong>and</strong> 4Yz ft high-about 50% shorter than con-<br />

246

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!