09.04.2013 Views

Astronautics and Aeronautics, 1967 - NASA's History Office

Astronautics and Aeronautics, 1967 - NASA's History Office

Astronautics and Aeronautics, 1967 - NASA's History Office

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

February 25 ASTRONAUTICS AM) AERONAUTICS, <strong>1967</strong><br />

Dr. Seamans said in his report that an “electrical malfunction” was<br />

regarded as “most likely source of ignition” of the fire but the “POS-<br />

sibility exists that no single source will ever be pinpointed.” Board was<br />

still considering chemical reactions in onboard materials, spontaneous<br />

combustion of certain materials, <strong>and</strong> possible electrical phenomena. Evi-<br />

dence indicated fire had had three distinct phases: originating in left<br />

side of spacecraft, it had burned several seconds unnoticed, then spread<br />

becoming more intense <strong>and</strong> causing cabin pressure to rise rapidly as<br />

atmosphere became heated. Fifteen seconds after crew first reported fire,<br />

cabin ruptured. During second phase, gases <strong>and</strong> flames flowed past as-<br />

tronauts’ couches <strong>and</strong> through hole moving from left to right. With<br />

cabin’s oxygen quickly reduced by rush of flames <strong>and</strong> gas outside, fire<br />

continued as localized flame, smoking heavily, in third phase. Dr. Sea-<br />

mans said Board noted: “The experience in flight <strong>and</strong> in tests prior to<br />

the accident had suggested that the probability of a spacecraft fire was<br />

low. Continued alertness to the possibility of fire had become dulled by<br />

previous ground experience <strong>and</strong> six years of successful manned mis-<br />

sions. . . . Potential ignition sources inside the spacecraft had been<br />

treated so as to be considered safe; neither the crews nor the test <strong>and</strong><br />

development personnel felt the risk of spacecraft fire to be high. . . .”<br />

Dr. Seamans emphasized that Board did not recommend changing pure<br />

oxygen system or planned cabin pressure for space flight, but did urge<br />

that “trade-offs between one- <strong>and</strong> two-gas atmospheres be re-evalu-<br />

ated . . . [<strong>and</strong>] pressurized oxygen no longer be used in prelaunch<br />

operations.” It also recommended: (1) combustible materials be re-<br />

placed where possible with nonflammable materials; (2) nonmetallic ma-<br />

terials be arranged to maintain fire breaks; (3) systems for oxygen <strong>and</strong><br />

liquid combustibles be made fire resistant; (4) full flammabiiicy tests<br />

be conducted with mockup of new configuration; (5) more rapidly <strong>and</strong><br />

easily operated hatch be installed; <strong>and</strong> (6) on-the-pad emergency pro-<br />

cedures be revised to recognize possibility of cabin fire. (NASA Release<br />

67-38)<br />

astronaut<br />

* NAS had received 9223 applications for 20-30 positions in NASA’s<br />

training program. Academy was expected to forward NASA a list of 60-75<br />

recommended c<strong>and</strong>idates in March for final selection. (Sehlstedt, Jr.,<br />

B Sun, 2/26/67)<br />

* Europe was weak educationally <strong>and</strong> should greatly exp<strong>and</strong> institutions of<br />

higher learning to close a “technological gap” that was widening in favor<br />

of US., Secrehry of Defense Robert S. McNamara told students at<br />

Millsaps College, Jackson, Miss. “Europe’s weakness is seriously crippling<br />

its growth. It is weak in general education, it is weak in its technical<br />

education, <strong>and</strong> it is particularly weak in its managerial education.”<br />

( W Post, 2/25/67,11)<br />

* Electrically powered cars, trucks, <strong>and</strong> buses, with limited ranges <strong>and</strong> speeds,<br />

could be produced with existing technology, <strong>and</strong> their general usage<br />

would greatly reduce air pollution, Federal Power Commission ( FPC)<br />

concluded in report to Senate Commerce Committee. Committee Chairman<br />

Sen. Warren G. Magnuson (D-Wash.) said he would hold hearings<br />

in March on the report which “hopefully will produce quick response<br />

from industry.” (Ayres, Jr., NYT, 2/26/67, 69)<br />

* Quasars, which radiate as much light <strong>and</strong> energy as a galaxy, appear to<br />

have a diameter only 1% as large as galaxies, scientists from U.K.’s<br />

Royal Astronomical Observatory <strong>and</strong> Royal Radar Establishment re-<br />

52

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!