09.04.2013 Views

Astronautics and Aeronautics, 1967 - NASA's History Office

Astronautics and Aeronautics, 1967 - NASA's History Office

Astronautics and Aeronautics, 1967 - NASA's History Office

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

ASTRONAUTICS AND AERONAUTICS, <strong>1967</strong> April 7<br />

April 7: Seven communications companies filed joint application with FCC<br />

for construction of new earth station near Cayey, Puerto Rico, <strong>and</strong> the<br />

transfer of ownership of three existing comsat stations. Companies-<br />

ComSatCorp ; AT&T; Hawaiian Telephone Co. ; ITT World Communica-<br />

tions, Inc. (WorldCom) ; ITT Cable <strong>and</strong> Radio, 1nc.-Puerto Rico; RCA;<br />

<strong>and</strong> Western Union International ( WUI) -submitted application pur-<br />

suant to March 27 earth-station ownership agreement. (ComSatCorp<br />

Release)<br />

0 Soviet scientist E. I. Taghiev told seventh World Petroleum Congress in<br />

Mexico City that U.S.S.R. planned to drill a 49,500-ft-deep test well to<br />

explore earth‘s crust <strong>and</strong> expressed regret that US. had ab<strong>and</strong>oned its<br />

Mohole drilling project in the Pacific. Site of Soviet project was not<br />

revealed. (AP, W Star, 4/7/67, A14)<br />

April 8: Cosmos CLIV was launched by U.S.S.R. into orbit with 232-km<br />

(144-mi) apogee, 186-km (116-mi) perigee, 88.5-min period, <strong>and</strong> 51.6’<br />

inclination. Equipment functioned normally. Satellite reentered Apr. 10.<br />

(Tech Wk, 4/10/67; GSFC SSR, 4/15/67)<br />

* Cosmonaut Yuri Gagarin, discussing Soviet space plans in Ogonyek, hinted<br />

that U.S.S.R. was preparing to launch a large manned space station in<br />

the near future. It had been speculated that U.S.S.R.-which had not<br />

launched a manned spacecraft since March 18, 1965-would conduct<br />

major manned launch in <strong>1967</strong> to commemorate 50th anniversary of the<br />

Bolshevik Revolution. Gagarin said there was little value in repeating<br />

feats already accomplished: “. . . it is not sensible in the future to put<br />

expensive spacecraft into orbit for several days. . . . It is apparent<br />

that they will have to stay in orbit a long time. It will be necessary<br />

to supply them <strong>and</strong> change crews with the use of simplified types of<br />

space vehicles. . . . The time is not far off when longer <strong>and</strong> more distant<br />

space flights will be made.”<br />

In later Novosti press agency report Soviet Academy of Sciences<br />

Chairman Anatoly A. Blagonravov supported Gagarin’s predictions <strong>and</strong><br />

said: “Mankind is entering the 7th year of the age of man’s space<br />

flight, <strong>and</strong> we do not doubt that in the not very distant future we will<br />

witness new space victories which will exert a growing influence on the<br />

life of people.” (Anderson, NYT, 4/9/67; UPI, W Star, 4/9/67, A13;<br />

C Trib, 4/10/67)<br />

April 9: Most probable cause of Jan. 27 flash fire in which Astronauts Virgil<br />

I. Grissom, Edward H. White 11, <strong>and</strong> Roger B. ChafFee died was a spark-<br />

ing short circuit in worn, defective, or poorly insulated wire, Apollo<br />

204 Review Board concluded in its final report. Copies of report were<br />

distributed simultaneously to NASA Administrator James E. Webb,<br />

congressional committees, <strong>and</strong> the press. Board was unable to pinpoint<br />

exact ignition source, but identified conditions which led to the disaster :<br />

(1) a sealed cabin, pressurized with an oxygen atmosphere; (2) an<br />

extensive distribution of combustible materials in the cabin; (3) vul-<br />

nerable wiring carrying spacecraft power; (4) inadequate provisions for<br />

the crew to escape; <strong>and</strong> (5) inadequate provisions for rescue or medical<br />

assistance. Having identified these conditions, the Board addressed<br />

itself to the question of “how these conditions came to exist. Careful<br />

consideration of this question . . . leads . . . to the conclusion that in<br />

its devotion to the many difficult problems of space travel, the Apollo<br />

team failed to give adequate attention to certain mundane but equally<br />

vital questions of crew safety.<br />

101

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!