09.04.2013 Views

Astronautics and Aeronautics, 1967 - NASA's History Office

Astronautics and Aeronautics, 1967 - NASA's History Office

Astronautics and Aeronautics, 1967 - NASA's History Office

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

April 9<br />

ASTRONAUTICS AND AERONAUTICS, <strong>1967</strong><br />

“The board’s investigation revealed many deficiencies in design <strong>and</strong><br />

engineering, manufacture <strong>and</strong> quality control. When these deficiencies<br />

are corrected the over-all reliability of the Apollo program will be<br />

increased greatly.”<br />

Board offered a total of 21 recommendations, including: (1) an “in-<br />

depth” review of the entire Apollo life-support system; (2) an investi-<br />

gation of effective ways to control <strong>and</strong> extinguish spacecraft fires; (3)<br />

severe restriction <strong>and</strong> control of amount <strong>and</strong> location of combustible<br />

materials inside spacecraft; (4) reduction of time required for crew<br />

to egress <strong>and</strong> simplification of escape operations; (5) continuous mon-<br />

itoring of safety of all test operations to assure adequacy of emergency<br />

protections; (6) improved ground communications system; (7) con-<br />

tinued studies of two-gas cabin atmosphere; <strong>and</strong> (8) full-scale mockup<br />

tests to establish fire safety of reconfigured comm<strong>and</strong> module. Board<br />

emphasized that its report was not intended as a criticism of NASA’s<br />

entire manned program: “The board is very concerned that its descrip-<br />

tion of the defects in the Apollo program . . .will be interpreted as an<br />

indictment of the entire manned space flight program <strong>and</strong> a castigation<br />

of the many people associated with the program. Nothing is further<br />

from the board’s mind.” (Text; NYT, 4/10/67, 1, 28-9; W Star, 4/<br />

10/67, Al, A6-7; W Post, 4/10/67, AI, A8)<br />

William H. Woodward was promoted from Deputy Director to Director of<br />

OART’S Space Power <strong>and</strong> Electric Propulsion Div.-formerly Nuclear<br />

Systems <strong>and</strong> Space Power Div.-succeeding Harold B. Finger, who<br />

became NASA Associate Administrator for Organization <strong>and</strong> Manage-<br />

ment March 15. Woodward would be responsible for planning, manag-<br />

ing, <strong>and</strong> coordinating advanced research <strong>and</strong> technology programs in<br />

the area of space power, including solar, chemical, nuclear, <strong>and</strong> electric<br />

propulsion. (NASA Release 67-78)<br />

0 NASA office-Downey at North American Aviation’s Downey, Calif., plant<br />

was disestablished <strong>and</strong> its functions transferred to MSC <strong>and</strong> MSFC,<br />

(NN 1136)<br />

* Completed section of USN’S $80-million radio communications center at<br />

Northwest Cape, Australia, was occupied by Navy personnel under Capt.<br />

Robert Friedman. Center, which would maintain contact with US.<br />

nuclear submarines in Pacific <strong>and</strong> Indian Oceans via very-low-frequency<br />

radio, would be fully operational in July. (Durdin, NYT, 4/9/67, 3)<br />

April 10: NASA Administrator James E. Webb, accompanied by Apollo 204<br />

Review Board members, NASA Deputy Administrator Robert C. Sea-<br />

mans, Jr., <strong>and</strong> NASA Associate Administrator for Manned Space Flight<br />

Dr. George E. Mueller, testified on Jan. 27 flash fire before House Com-<br />

mittee on Science <strong>and</strong> <strong>Astronautics</strong>’ Subcommittee on NASA Over-<br />

sight. Webb said the Board had found error, “but it has also found the<br />

capability within NASA <strong>and</strong> the Apollo team of contractors to over-<br />

come error.” NASA <strong>and</strong> industry would share their part of the blame “for<br />

what we have done or left undone,” Webb said, but the committee could<br />

have confidence that “NASA <strong>and</strong> its contractors have the capability to<br />

overcome every deficiency required to proceed to successfully fly the<br />

Apollo Saturn system <strong>and</strong> accomplish its objectives.” He said Board<br />

Chairman Dr. Floyd Thompson had reassured him that the “concepts<br />

<strong>and</strong> the basic design on which the Apollo system is based can be made<br />

to work in a reliable manner,” <strong>and</strong> Astronaut/Board member Frank<br />

Borman had reported he would be confident to 0y the Apollo spacecraft<br />

102

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!