09.04.2013 Views

Astronautics and Aeronautics, 1967 - NASA's History Office

Astronautics and Aeronautics, 1967 - NASA's History Office

Astronautics and Aeronautics, 1967 - NASA's History Office

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

ASTRONAUTICS AND AERONAUTICS, <strong>1967</strong> October 11<br />

* U.S.S.R. successfully launched Cosmos CLXXXI into orbit with 863-km<br />

(536-mi) apogee, 668-km (415-mi) perigee, 101.1-min period, <strong>and</strong><br />

99.16’ inclination. Satellite reentered Oct. 18. ( GSFC SSR, 10/31/67)<br />

USAF launched unidentified satellite from V<strong>and</strong>enberg AFB employing a<br />

ThorBurner I1 booster. (UPI, P EB, 10/11/67,2; Pres Rep <strong>1967</strong>)<br />

* NASA announced organizational changes in preparation for changes that<br />

would occur when Deputy Administrator Dr. Robert C. Seamans, Jr.,<br />

left NASA Jan. 1 : (1) General Counsel Paul G. Dembling <strong>and</strong> Executive<br />

Secretary John R. Biggs would report directly to NASA Administrator<br />

James E. Webb; (2) Assistant General Counsel for Procurement Matters<br />

S. Neil Hosenball would fill new post of Deputy General Counsel; <strong>and</strong> (3)<br />

OMSF Secretariat representative Frank J. Magliato would serve as Spe-<br />

cial Assistant to the Administrator <strong>and</strong> direct organization of a Head-<br />

quarters Communications Center. ( NASA Release 67-263)<br />

* Executive Order 11374, abolishing Missile Sites Labor Commission, <strong>and</strong><br />

transferring its functions <strong>and</strong> responsibilities to Federal Mediation <strong>and</strong><br />

Conciliation Service, was signed by President. (PD, 10/16/67,1430-1)<br />

Sen. Henry n/l. Jackson (D-Wash.) expressed concern about US. de-<br />

fense policy in speech to the Hoover Institution on War, Revolution,<br />

<strong>and</strong> Peace meeting at Stanford Univ. He cited three specific ideas with<br />

which he disagreed: (1) exaggerated picture of US. as catalyst in Soviet<br />

desire to “possess a first-rate military establishment,” (2) theory that<br />

military technology had reached a plateau <strong>and</strong> stabilized, <strong>and</strong> (3) seem<br />

ing trend toward nuclear parity. Some scientists <strong>and</strong> defense planners, he<br />

said, had “a mirror image interpretation of Moscow’s decisions . . .<br />

seeing them as reflex actions” <strong>and</strong> believed that if U.S. did not act<br />

U.S.S.R. would not act. He also argued, “Ordinary economic technology<br />

is always finding better ways to do things <strong>and</strong> there is no reason to sup-<br />

pose that military technology will cease in this effort.” Sen. Jackson be-<br />

lieved that “international peace <strong>and</strong> security depend not on a parity of<br />

power but on a preponderance of power in the peacekeepers over the<br />

peace-upsetters. Our aim is not . . . an unlimited accumulation of weap-<br />

ons . . . [but] to create <strong>and</strong> maintain . . . a relationship of forces<br />

favorable to the deterrent of adventurism <strong>and</strong> aggression.” (Text)<br />

“The ceremonies in Washington, Moscow <strong>and</strong> London putting the space<br />

treaty into effect mark not only the first major East-West agreement<br />

since the nuclear test ban treaty of 1963 but a potential starting point<br />

for an even more momentous accord,” New York Times commented on<br />

space law treaty which went into effect Oct. 10. It added that “recent<br />

statements by the Soviet Union’s leading space scientist, Professor<br />

Leonid Sedov, indicate that the Russians too may be coming around<br />

to the conclusion that the costs of going it alone to the moon <strong>and</strong> beyond<br />

outweigh the dimming propag<strong>and</strong>a magic.” (NYT, 10/11/67)<br />

* Jonathan Spivak in Wall Street Journal commented on congressional cuts<br />

in NASA’s Fy 1968 budget: “Plans to launch unmanned satellites to<br />

Mars or Venus in 1971 <strong>and</strong> 1973 <strong>and</strong> conduct extended exploration of<br />

the moon by astronauts face probable ab<strong>and</strong>onment because of a lack<br />

of funds. There will also be sharp curtailment of proposals for longduration<br />

manned flights in orbit about the earth to enhance the nation’s<br />

space technology <strong>and</strong> exploit practical <strong>and</strong> scientific applications of<br />

space. Thus, say space officials, the present outlook is that only a limited<br />

national space program will continue in the 1970s after the lunar l<strong>and</strong>ing.’’<br />

(Spivak, WSJ, 10/11/67, 24)<br />

299

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!