24.04.2013 Views

The Ecclesiastical History of Evagrius Scholasticus - Coptic ...

The Ecclesiastical History of Evagrius Scholasticus - Coptic ...

The Ecclesiastical History of Evagrius Scholasticus - Coptic ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

ECCLESIASTICAL HISTORY: BOOK II 97<br />

Apollo,while in the south from the harbour <strong>of</strong> Julian as far as houses lying<br />

not far from the oratory <strong>of</strong> the Church named Concord, and in the<br />

midmost part<strong>of</strong> the city from the Forumwiththe appellation Constantine<br />

as far as the market called that <strong>of</strong> Taurus, a spectacle pitiful and most<br />

hateful to all. 142 For all the beauties which rose above the city, whether<br />

embellished to unrivalled magni¢cence, or answering to public or private<br />

needs, were instantly transformed into mountains and hills impossible to<br />

traverse or cross and ¢lled with every kind <strong>of</strong> material, confounding the<br />

previous appearance. Hence not even the inhabitants were able to know<br />

what or where the place <strong>of</strong> the previous buildings happened to be.<br />

14 At the same time, while a Scythian war was in progress against the<br />

eastern Romans, the lands <strong>of</strong> Thrace and the Hellespont were shaken, as<br />

well as Ionia and the islands called Cyclades, with the result that much <strong>of</strong><br />

Cnidus and <strong>of</strong> the Cretan island was levelled. 143 And Priscus narrates<br />

that there were extraordinary rains in Constantinople and the province<br />

<strong>of</strong> Bithynia, since for three or four days water poured like a torrent from<br />

heaven; and that mountains were levelled into plains, that villages were<br />

inundated and destroyed, and that islands even appeared in the lake <strong>of</strong><br />

Boane, not far distant from Nicomedia, from the multitude <strong>of</strong> rubbish<br />

that was accumulated in it. But these things occurred later. 144 [66]<br />

142 On the northern side <strong>of</strong> the city the ¢re spread from the harbour area (<strong>The</strong>ophanes<br />

112:19^24 mentions the Neorion dockyard) up to the Acropolis where the former temple <strong>of</strong><br />

Apollo stood; on the south it stretched from the harbour <strong>of</strong> Julian (<strong>The</strong>ophanes mentions<br />

the nearby Church <strong>of</strong> S. Thomas) west to the Church <strong>of</strong> Concord, Homonoia, located in the<br />

ninth region (Janin, E¤glises 382); the Forum Tauri was a synonym for the Forum <strong>of</strong> <strong>The</strong>odosius,<br />

which, like that <strong>of</strong> Constantine, was located on the Mese, Constantinople’s main<br />

thoroughfare.<br />

143 <strong>The</strong> date is uncertain. M. Henry, cited in Mango and Scott, <strong>The</strong>ophanes 150, n. 1 ad.<br />

A.M. 5934, speculates that the tremors should be dated to <strong>The</strong>odosius II’s reign and linked<br />

with the quake on Crete recorded by Malalas 359:15^18; this is possible, although there is no<br />

reason to doubt that the same area might have been struck by earthquakes a couple <strong>of</strong><br />

decades apart. <strong>The</strong> Scythian war may refer to attacks by Attila’s son, Dengizich, who was<br />

¢ghting the Romansin 467andagainin 469.Festugie' re (271 n.88, following Stein) attributed<br />

the destruction in Thrace to these Huns and that in the Aegean area to Vandals who raided<br />

the eastern Mediterranean in 467; but there is no mention here <strong>of</strong> Vandals, and the language<br />

<strong>of</strong> shaking and levelling is more appropriate to an earthquake. <strong>The</strong> chapter continues with<br />

other natural disasters, which also suggests that the ¢rst part describes an earthquake.<br />

144 Blockley, Historians II. 354^6 printed the whole <strong>of</strong> this chapter as Priscus fr. 48.2,<br />

though admitting (397) that, strictly, <strong>Evagrius</strong>’ reference to Priscus only relates to the<br />

deluge; there is no other evidence to allow the deluge to be dated.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!