24.04.2013 Views

The Ecclesiastical History of Evagrius Scholasticus - Coptic ...

The Ecclesiastical History of Evagrius Scholasticus - Coptic ...

The Ecclesiastical History of Evagrius Scholasticus - Coptic ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

ECCLESIASTICAL HISTORY: BOOK IV 235<br />

are colonnades which round o¡ this great achievement with columns and<br />

small arches. 93<br />

But so that the marvel <strong>of</strong> its construction may be clearer, I have<br />

decided to include the dimensions <strong>of</strong> its length, breadth and height as<br />

well as the span and height <strong>of</strong> its arches. 94 <strong>The</strong>se are as follows: now the<br />

length from the door opposite the sacred apse where the [181] bloodless<br />

sacri¢ce is celebrated as far as the apse itself is 190 feet, while the<br />

breadth north to south is 115 feet, and the drop from the centre <strong>of</strong> the<br />

dome to the foundations is 180 feet; as for the arches the breadth <strong>of</strong> each<br />

is [. . .] feet, while the length from east to west is 260 feet; the width <strong>of</strong><br />

the open area between them is 75 feet. 95 Towards the setting sun there<br />

are also two other splendid colonnades, and on all sides open air courts<br />

are beautifully executed. 96 <strong>The</strong> shrine <strong>of</strong> the Holy Apostles, which does<br />

not willingly grant precedence to any other building, was also constructed<br />

by him: in it the emperors and the clergy receive due burial. 97<br />

And so concerning these and similar matters this is about enough.<br />

93 <strong>The</strong> crucial word in this sentence is e ’¤nerye, ‘underneath’, which indicates that <strong>Evagrius</strong><br />

is dealing with the ground £oor (as opposed to colonnades in the galleries, as Mango,<br />

Art 80).<br />

94 <strong>Evagrius</strong> now switches from an obscure verbal picture to a more prosaic, but still problematic,<br />

list <strong>of</strong> ¢gures.<br />

95 For discussion <strong>of</strong> the dimensions, see Mango, Art 80 n. 116. <strong>The</strong> length <strong>of</strong> 190 feet<br />

from west door to apse can only refer to the distance as far as the opening <strong>of</strong> the two<br />

exedrae on either side <strong>of</strong> the apse, since the overall length from west door to the end <strong>of</strong> the<br />

apse is 260 feet (1 Roman foot = 0.309 metre); it is confusing that this overall ¢gure is included<br />

within the section devoted to the arches, and if one were to be charitable to <strong>Evagrius</strong><br />

one might suspect some textual corruption at this point. <strong>The</strong> breadth <strong>of</strong> the nave from north<br />

to south colonnade is only 105 feet, and <strong>Evagrius</strong> is either mistaken or his ¢gure has been<br />

corrupted; the ¢gure for the height <strong>of</strong> the dome is accurate. <strong>The</strong> ¢gure for the breadth <strong>of</strong> the<br />

arches has dropped out <strong>of</strong> the text (there is space for about eight letters), but might have<br />

been 100; the open area <strong>of</strong> 75 feet denotes the east^west space between the piers above<br />

which the galleries are located.<br />

96 At the west end <strong>of</strong> the church stood the narthex and exonarthex, and beyond them a<br />

large atrium.<br />

97 Justinian’s reconstruction <strong>of</strong> the Holy Apostles is described by Procopius, Buildings<br />

i.4.9^18, who noted that in certain respects it resembled S. Sophia in design, but was inferior<br />

in size: this is the point <strong>of</strong> <strong>Evagrius</strong>’ reference to it not willingly granting precedence to other<br />

buildings, since its status as the second church <strong>of</strong> the capital made it superior to everything<br />

else (Festugie' re’s interpretation, 394, that the building does not want to give primacy to any<br />

particular Apostle, is untenable). For its use as an imperial and patriarchal mausoleum, see<br />

Grierson, ‘Tombs’.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!