24.04.2013 Views

The Ecclesiastical History of Evagrius Scholasticus - Coptic ...

The Ecclesiastical History of Evagrius Scholasticus - Coptic ...

The Ecclesiastical History of Evagrius Scholasticus - Coptic ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

ECCLESIASTICAL HISTORY: BOOK II 105<br />

Thus when all the transactions <strong>of</strong> the Second Synod at Ephesus had<br />

been read, and its speci¢c sentence against Flavian and Eusebius was<br />

likewise read, 166 at the words, ‘<strong>The</strong>n Bishop Hilary stated’, the bishops<br />

<strong>of</strong> the East and those with them shouted: ‘Anathema on Dioscorus. At<br />

the very moment that he deposed, at that very moment was he deposed.<br />

Holy Lord, You avenge him. Orthodox emperor, you avenge him.<br />

Many years for Leo. Many years for the patriarch.’ 167 <strong>The</strong>n, when the<br />

next parts were also read out which reveal that all the assembled<br />

bishops consented to the deposition <strong>of</strong> Flavian and Eusebius, 168 the<br />

most illustrious o⁄cials proposed as follows, word for word: 169<br />

Concerning the orthodox and universal faith we resolve that it is<br />

necessary to make a more precise investigation at the next opportunity,<br />

when the assembly is more complete. But as for Flavian<br />

<strong>of</strong> pious memory and Eusebius the most devout bishop, from examination<br />

<strong>of</strong> what was done and decided and from the very<br />

words <strong>of</strong> those who were leaders <strong>of</strong> the Council then, who stated<br />

that they were mistaken and had deposed those men invalidly,<br />

since they are revealed to have been unjustly deposed in that they<br />

committed no error concerning the faith, it seems to us to be just,<br />

in accordance with the pleasure <strong>of</strong> God, if it is upheld by our<br />

most sacred and pious master, that upon Dioscorus, the most<br />

devout bishop <strong>of</strong> Alexandria, and Juvenal, the most devout<br />

bishop <strong>of</strong> Jerusalem, [73] and Thalassius, the most devout<br />

bishop <strong>of</strong> Caesarea in Cappadocia, and Eusebius, the most<br />

devout bishop <strong>of</strong> Armenia, and Eustathius, the most devout<br />

bishop <strong>of</strong> Beirut, and Basil, the most devout bishop <strong>of</strong> Seleucia<br />

in Isauria, who had held authority and were leaders at the Synod<br />

then, the same penalty should be in£icted by the holy Synod: in<br />

accordance with the canons, these men should be estranged from<br />

the dignity <strong>of</strong> bishop, and all consequentials should be decided<br />

by the sacred eminence.<br />

At this the Easterners cried out: ‘This decision is just.’ <strong>The</strong> bishops <strong>of</strong><br />

Illyria roared out: ‘We have all gone astray, we all request forgiveness.’<br />

166 ACO II.i.1, p. 191:9^28.<br />

167 ACO II.i.1, p. 191:30^6; Hilary said ‘contradicitur’.<br />

168 ACO II.i.1, pp. 192:3^195:9.<br />

169 ACO II.i.1, p. 195:10^24, already quoted by <strong>Evagrius</strong> at pp. 44.26^45:15.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!