24.04.2013 Views

The Ecclesiastical History of Evagrius Scholasticus - Coptic ...

The Ecclesiastical History of Evagrius Scholasticus - Coptic ...

The Ecclesiastical History of Evagrius Scholasticus - Coptic ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

ECCLESIASTICAL HISTORY: BOOK II 117<br />

subjected to the insults . . .’, 206 when the Illyrian and Palestinian bishops<br />

expressed doubt, the same Aetius read a chapter <strong>of</strong> Cyril which contained<br />

the following: ‘Whereas there are some <strong>of</strong> the expressions which are<br />

particularly appropriate to Divinity, thus again there are others which<br />

are appropriate to humanity, while others occupy a sort <strong>of</strong> middle rank<br />

and represent the Son <strong>of</strong> God as being God and man together in the<br />

same.’<br />

And after this when the aforesaid bishops expressed doubts about<br />

another part <strong>of</strong> Leo’s letter, which contained: 207 ‘For if most certainly<br />

indeed in the Lord Jesus Christ there is one person <strong>of</strong> God and man,<br />

nevertheless the thing through which the insult is common in each is one<br />

thing, and that through which the glory is established in common is<br />

another thing. For from us He has the humanity which is inferior to the<br />

Father, but from the Father He has the Divinity in which He is equal<br />

with the Father . . .’, <strong>The</strong>odoret weighed matters up and said that the<br />

blessed Cyril too had said as follows, word for word: [85] ‘And after<br />

becoming man and not laying aside his own nature, He remained what<br />

He was, and one thing dwelt in something di¡erent, namely the divine<br />

nature with men.’<br />

After this, when the illustrious o⁄cials enquired whether anyone was<br />

still doubtful, they all said that they were no longer in doubt. 208 After<br />

this Atticus, Bishop <strong>of</strong> Nicopolis, requested that they have an adjournment<br />

<strong>of</strong> a few days so that what seemed right to God and the holy<br />

Fathers might be formulated with unru¥ed thought and untroubled<br />

consideration. He requested that they also take the letter <strong>of</strong> Cyril which<br />

was written to Nestorius, in which he exhorted him to agree to his<br />

Twelve Chapters, to which everyone agreed. And after the o⁄cials<br />

proposed that they should have an adjournment <strong>of</strong> ¢ve days to assemble<br />

with Anatolius, the prelate <strong>of</strong> Constantinople, all the bishops acclaimed,<br />

saying: ‘We believe thus, we all believe thus; just as Leo, thus do we<br />

believe. None <strong>of</strong> us is doubtful; we have all subscribed.’ 209<br />

With regard to this the following was proposed in these terms: ‘It is<br />

not necessary for all <strong>of</strong> you to assemble; but since it is appropriate that<br />

206 Leo’s phrasing again appears to separate the divine and human elements in Christ’s<br />

body.<br />

207 ACO II.i.2, p. 82:23^33.<br />

208 Request for adjournment: ACO II.i.2, pp. 82:34^83:18.<br />

209 I.e. to the expulsion <strong>of</strong> Dioscorus.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!