17.06.2013 Views

UBLIC HEARING: Director of Development ... - City of Glendale

UBLIC HEARING: Director of Development ... - City of Glendale

UBLIC HEARING: Director of Development ... - City of Glendale

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

4. 7. Risk <strong>of</strong> Upset<br />

Although there are facilities that use potentially hazardous materials or that have<br />

experienced leaking USTs in the vicinity <strong>of</strong> the project site, the likelihood <strong>of</strong> any <strong>of</strong> these<br />

facilities having an impact on the project site is low, due to either the extent <strong>of</strong> the problem.<br />

location, distance, or the direction <strong>of</strong> groundwater flow, as indicated in an assessment prepared<br />

for the project site. 54 Section 4.3., Water (Hydrology), includes a description <strong>of</strong> the EPA<br />

Superfund project as it relates to the project site.<br />

The risk <strong>of</strong> upset level <strong>of</strong> the proposed project would be comparable to that <strong>of</strong> any other<br />

Restricted Industrial development in the Redevelopment Area that either would not use or would<br />

use limited amounts <strong>of</strong> hazardous materials. Fire prevention standards and procedures for the<br />

hydrology, storage and disposal <strong>of</strong> hazardous material for the proposed project would follow<br />

those prescribed in the Uniform Building Code, and other applicable regulations. Therefore,<br />

similar to the Redevelopment Plan, the project does not represent an unusual or unique risk <strong>of</strong><br />

explosion or release <strong>of</strong> hazardous substances, and does not change the conclusions <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Program EIR. The project would have a less than significant impact with the implementation<br />

<strong>of</strong> the mitigation measures listed below.<br />

MITIGATION l\1EASURES<br />

Although the hazardous material assessment found no significant level <strong>of</strong> contamination<br />

on-site, to address the possibility that some undetected localized areas <strong>of</strong> contamination could<br />

still exist, the following mitigation measures are recommended: 55<br />

1. If suspect soils (discolored, odorous, or stained) are encountered during<br />

excavation, sampling and testing <strong>of</strong> the excavation face or a stockpile for<br />

pr<strong>of</strong>iling and from the base <strong>of</strong> the excavation area, should beperfonned.<br />

2. If impacted soils are encountered and conI1.I1l1.ed by testing, special handling and<br />

disposal to a sanitary dump site or hazardous materials dump site will be<br />

required.<br />

54 Dames & Moore. Phase I Environmental Site Assessment. LADWP Crystal Springs Maintenance Yard.<br />

November 22. 1995, page 20.<br />

55 Dames & Moore. Phase II Site Characterization. LADWP Crystal Springs Maintenance Yard. January 25.<br />

I996. page 20.<br />

Planning ConsultanlS Research<br />

<strong>Glendale</strong> Redenlopment Agency<br />

Page 62<br />

DreamWorks Animation Campus Addendum EIR<br />

June 1996

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!