17.06.2013 Views

UBLIC HEARING: Director of Development ... - City of Glendale

UBLIC HEARING: Director of Development ... - City of Glendale

UBLIC HEARING: Director of Development ... - City of Glendale

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

4. 7. Risk <strong>of</strong> Upset<br />

Although there are facilities that use potentially hazardous materials or that have<br />

experienced leaking USTs in the vicinity <strong>of</strong> the project site, the likelihood <strong>of</strong> any <strong>of</strong> these<br />

facilities having an impact on the project site is low, due to either the extent <strong>of</strong> the problem.<br />

location, distance, or the direction <strong>of</strong> groundwater flow, as indicated in an assessment prepared<br />

for the project site. 54 Section 4.3., Water (Hydrology), includes a description <strong>of</strong> the EPA<br />

Superfund project as it relates to the project site.<br />

The risk <strong>of</strong> upset level <strong>of</strong> the proposed project would be comparable to that <strong>of</strong> any other<br />

Restricted Industrial development in the Redevelopment Area that either would not use or would<br />

use limited amounts <strong>of</strong> hazardous materials. Fire prevention standards and procedures for the<br />

hydrology, storage and disposal <strong>of</strong> hazardous material for the proposed project would follow<br />

those prescribed in the Uniform Building Code, and other applicable regulations. Therefore,<br />

similar to the Redevelopment Plan, the project does not represent an unusual or unique risk <strong>of</strong><br />

explosion or release <strong>of</strong> hazardous substances, and does not change the conclusions <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Program EIR. The project would have a less than significant impact with the implementation<br />

<strong>of</strong> the mitigation measures listed below.<br />

MITIGATION l\1EASURES<br />

Although the hazardous material assessment found no significant level <strong>of</strong> contamination<br />

on-site, to address the possibility that some undetected localized areas <strong>of</strong> contamination could<br />

still exist, the following mitigation measures are recommended: 55<br />

1. If suspect soils (discolored, odorous, or stained) are encountered during<br />

excavation, sampling and testing <strong>of</strong> the excavation face or a stockpile for<br />

pr<strong>of</strong>iling and from the base <strong>of</strong> the excavation area, should beperfonned.<br />

2. If impacted soils are encountered and conI1.I1l1.ed by testing, special handling and<br />

disposal to a sanitary dump site or hazardous materials dump site will be<br />

required.<br />

54 Dames & Moore. Phase I Environmental Site Assessment. LADWP Crystal Springs Maintenance Yard.<br />

November 22. 1995, page 20.<br />

55 Dames & Moore. Phase II Site Characterization. LADWP Crystal Springs Maintenance Yard. January 25.<br />

I996. page 20.<br />

Planning ConsultanlS Research<br />

<strong>Glendale</strong> Redenlopment Agency<br />

Page 62<br />

DreamWorks Animation Campus Addendum EIR<br />

June 1996

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!