UBLIC HEARING: Director of Development ... - City of Glendale

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Table 12 4. 9. Transportation/Circulation YEAR 2027 INTERSECTION LEVELS OF SERVICE FROM REDEVELOPJ.\,1ENT PLAN FEIR Redevelopment Plan Year 2027 With Redevelopment Plan Mitigation Program Intersection 1. Lake St & Sonora Ave Hour A.M. Peak VIC 0.61 LOS B VIC a LOS P.M. Peak 0.79 C a 2. Flower St & Western Ave A.M. Peak 1.55 F P.M. Peak 2.22 F 3. Flower St & Sonora Ave A.M. Peak 0.86 D P.M. Peak 1.00 E 4. San Fernando Rd & Sonora Ave A.M. Peak 0.92 E 0.68 B P.M. Peak 1.03 F 0.83 D 5. San Fernando Rd & Grandview Ave A.M. Peak 1.08 F 0.85 D P.M. Peak 1.51 F 0.83 D 6. San Fernando Rd & Highland Ave A.M. Peak 1.13 F 0.81 D P.M. Peak 1.12 F 0.80 C 7. San Fernando Rd & Fairmon! Ave A.M. Peak 1.14 F 0.96 E P.M. Peak 1.18 F 0.90 D 8. San Fernando Rd & Doran St A.M. Peak 1.04 F 0.80 C P.M. Peak 1.67 F 1.02 F 9. San Fernando Rd & California Ave A.M. Peak 0.74 C 0.56 A P.M. Peak 0.94 E 0.72 C 10. San Fernando Rd & Broadway A.M. Peak 0.82 D 0.66 B a Intersection is not impacted. therefore, no mitigation is required. P.M. Peak 1.13 F 0.85 D b Unavoidable significant impact: no mitigation recommended in the Redevelopment Plan Program EIR. Source: Colton/Beland/Associates. Inc., wFinal Environmental Impact Report for the Redevelopment Plan for the San Fernando Road Corridor, W November 1992. Planning Consullants Research Glendale Redevelopment Agency Page 75 DreamWorks AJWnation CampllS Addendum EIR June 1996 b b b b
4. 9. Transportation/Circulation The traffic study conducted as part of the Redevelopment Plan FEIR assumes that the project site develops as Restricted Industrial use to an FAR of 0.75. Given the site area of 12.21 acres per County Assessor records (not including the proposed quitclaim of the Victory Truck Boulevard easement), it is estimated that the Redevelopment Plan FEIR traffic study includes development of about 398,900 square feet of Restricted Industrial uses on the project site. Using the trip generation rates published in the Redevelopment Plan FEIR, Table 13 on page 77, indicates that this level of development would generate approximately 365 trips during the A.M. peak hour and 390 trips during the P.M. peak hour. These trips were distributed across the street system using distribution patterns from the Redevelopment Plan FEIR, and were subtracted from the Year 2010 base traffic forecasts to represent Year 2010 volumes without any development on the project site. The projected Year 2010 cumulative base traffic volumes at the eleven study intersections are included in Appendix C. These forecasts represent projected conditions at Year 2010 with development under the provisions of the Redevelopment Plan throughout the Redevelopment Plan area,· but without any development on the project site. Levels of Service and Mitigation Measures The Year 2010 cumulative base traffic forecasts were analyzed to detennined the projected future peak hour levels of service at the eleven study intersections, without any development on the project site and without consideration of the mitigation measures proposed in the Redevelopment Plan FEIR. Table 14 on page 78, summarizes the results of this analysis. As can be seen in Table 14, four of the intersections (Flower Street/Western Avenue, San Fernando Road/Sonora Avenue, San Fernando Road/Grandview Avenue, and San Fernando Road/Doran Street) are projected to operate at poor levels of service of E or F during one or both of the A.M. and P.M. peak hours under Year 2010 conditions with development throughout the Redevelopment Plan area but with no development on the project site. The Redevelopment Plan FEIR proposed mitigation measures at three of these locations to mitigate Year 2027 conditions. An analysis was conducted to detennine what components of the Redevelopment Plan FEIR mitigation program would need to be implemented to mitigate the Redevelopment Plan traffic impacts at 2010 with no development on the project site. The Planning ConsulranlS Research Glendale Redenlopment Agency Page 76 DreamWorks Animation Campus Addeadum EJR June 1996
Page 3 and 4:
DreamWorks Animation Campus Stage t
Page 5:
DreamWor!l;s Animation Campus Stage
Page 9 and 10:
Project changes do not create any n
Page 12 and 13:
RESOLUTION NO. _ RESOLUTION OF THE
Page 14:
Transportation/Circulation, specifi
Page 22 and 23:
TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION 1
Page 24 and 25:
Figure LIST OF FIGURES 1 Redevelopm
Page 26 and 27:
1. INTRODUCTION This document is an
Page 28:
2. PROJECT OVERVIEW peR P LAN N I N
Page 34:
Planning Consultants Research N A a
Page 38:
THE PROPOSED PROJECT 2. Project Ove
Page 43:
2. Project Overview within the Drea
Page 60 and 61:
4. 1. Earth fault, located near the
Page 62 and 63:
12 4. 1. Earth 4. An erosion contro
Page 65 and 66:
Carbon Monoxide Nitrogen Oxides Rea
Page 70 and 71: Table 6 LOCAL CARBON MONOXIDE CONCE
Page 72 and 73: PlaMing Consultants Research Glenda
Page 74 and 75: 4. 3. Water (Hydrology) partIcIpate
Page 76 and 77: 4. 3. Water (Hydrology) apply in Fl
Page 78 and 79: REDEVELOPMENT PLAN IMPACTS 4. ENVIR
Page 80 and 81: 35 4. 4. Noise made acceptable for
Page 83 and 84: 39 4. 4. Noise hours of 7:00 A.M. a
Page 85 and 86: 4. 4. Noise 1. The City of Glendale
Page 87 and 88: 4. 5. Light and Glare likely be vis
Page 89 and 90: 4. 5. Light and Glare 3. Outdoor li
Page 91 and 92: 4. 6. Land Use 2. The promotion of
Page 93: 4. 6. Land Use border. adjacent to
Page 101 and 102: 4. 6. Land Use therefore enhance an
Page 104 and 105: 4. 7. Risk of Upset Although there
Page 106 and 107: 56 REDEVELOPMENT PLAN IMPACTS 4. EN
Page 109: 4. 8. Population/Housing moderate i
Page 114: 4. 9. Transportation/Circulation
Page 120 and 121: Table 13 4. 9. Transponation/Circul
Page 125 and 126: Land Use acre S9.Ft. Animalion Stud
Page 127 and 128: Project Impacts at Year 2027 4. 9.
Page 130: Table I7 4. 9. Transportation/Circu
Page 133 and 134: 4. 10. I. Police Therefore, because
Page 136 and 137: 4. 10. 2. Fire 2 1 /2 inches. Fire
Page 138 and 139: 4. 10. 3. Schools classrooms at Dis
Page 140 and 141: 4. 10. 3. Schools would, however, s
Page 142 and 143: 4. 10. 4. Library Although the Drea
Page 144 and 145: 4. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS 4.
Page 146 and 147: 4. 12. 1. Water system due to compl
Page 148 and 149: REDEVELOPMENT PLAN IMPACTS 4. ENVIR
Page 150 and 151: MITIGATION MEASURES 4. 12. 2. Sewag
Page 154 and 155: 4. 12. 4. Natural Gas Industrial de
Page 156 and 157: PROJECT IMPACTS 4. 12. 5. Solid Was
Page 159 and 160: 4. 13. Human Health to expose peopl
Page 161 and 162: 4. 14. Recreation demand for park f
Page 163 and 164: 4. 15. Cultural Resources on-site a
Page 165: 4. 16. Issues Not Included in the F
Page 169:
D. BIOTA LETTERS This Appendix cont
Page 173:
California Department of Fish and G
Page 179:
112 SCALE 1: 24000 o tHISTORIC USGS
Page 185:
LOOKING ACROSS THE LOW AREA TO THE
Page 195:
W:\9553IMU\SKG·D-L.DOC ATTACHMENT
Page 215:
A-2. CALINE ANALYSIS DATA The follo
Page 223:
lENV028Fl.l TIME RATE ADJUSTMENT BA
Page 231:
B-1. HELICOPTER NOISE ASSESSMENT Th
Page 245:
Arup Acoustics Consultants in Acous
Page 249:
Arup Acoustics Ms. Ricarda Bennett
Page 259:
site. B-3. HELICOPTER OPERATIONS LE
Page 265:
Glendale Redevelopment Agency Glenn
Page 269:
TABLE 1 Total Number of Flight Even
Page 275:
ApPENDIX C TRAFFIC VOLUMES AND LANE
Page 285:
C-2. LANE CONFIGURATIONS The follow
Page 296 and 297:
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
Page 298:
1 WHEREAS, the City Council has rev
Page 306:
EXHIBIT A FIRST AMENDMENT TO DREAMW
Page 314 and 315:
development of the Project will pro
Page 316 and 317:
Participant shall be responsible fo
Page 318 and 319:
Department in the event of conflict
Page 320:
City agrees to provide a sufficient
Page 326 and 327:
6. In any year, if the combination
Page 328 and 329:
C. [§ 303] ObliQation 10 Refrain f
Page 330 and 331:
The covenants against discriminatio
Page 332 and 333:
the County of Los Angeles, State of
Page 335 and 336:
commence and diligently process all
Page 341:
ATTACHMENT lA SITE MAP 1
Page 344 and 345:
ATTACHMENT lC GLENDALE PARCEL LEGAL
Page 347 and 348:
adjacent to the Los Angeles River.
Page 349 and 350:
CITYOF Glendale CALIFORNIA Planmng
Page 351 and 352:
Case No. 9557-5 1000 Flower Street
Page 354 and 355:
I CITYOF Glendale CALIFORNIA Planni
Page 356 and 357:
Case No. 9558 CU 1000 Flower Street
Page 361 and 362:
WHEREAS, the Program EIR has the ad
Page 363:
WdEREAS, it was deemed that no miti
Page 372 and 373:
RECORDING REQUESTED BY When Recorde
Page 375 and 376:
ATTACHMENT 3A Ml ZONE REGULATIONS "
Page 378:
30.84.060 in any manner so as to cr
Page 384:
ATTACHMENT 5 FORM OF ORDINANCE APPR
Page 389:
ATTACHMENT 6 FORM OF RESOLUTION APP
Page 394 and 395:
Recording Requested by: Glendale Re
Page 396 and 397:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ss. COUNTY
Page 398 and 399:
ATTACHMENT 9 GLENDALE COSTS REPAYME
Page 400:
ATTACHMENT 10 INDUCEMENT AGREEMENT
Page 416:
Second A.ddendum to the Program EIR
Page 426 and 427:
Second Addendum to the Program EIR,
Page 441:
Second Addendum to the Program EIR,
Page 447:
..11:>
Page 457 and 458:
TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION 1
Page 459 and 460:
Figure LIST OF FIGURES 1 Redevelopm
Page 461 and 462:
1. INTRODUCTION This document is an
Page 463:
2. PROJECT OVERVIEW peR P LAN N I N
Page 469:
Planning Consultants Research N A a
Page 473:
THE PROPOSED PROJECT 2. Project Ove
Page 478:
2. Project Overview within the Drea
Page 495 and 496:
4. 1. Earth fault, located near the
Page 497 and 498:
12 4. 1. Earth 4. An erosion contro
Page 500 and 501:
Carbon Monoxide Nitrogen Oxides Rea
Page 505 and 506:
Table 6 LOCAL CARBON MONOXIDE CONCE
Page 507 and 508:
PlaMing Consultants Research Glenda
Page 509 and 510:
4. 3. Water (Hydrology) partIcIpate
Page 511 and 512:
4. 3. Water (Hydrology) apply in Fl
Page 513 and 514:
REDEVELOPMENT PLAN IMPACTS 4. ENVIR
Page 515 and 516:
35 4. 4. Noise made acceptable for
Page 518 and 519:
39 4. 4. Noise hours of 7:00 A.M. a
Page 520 and 521:
4. 4. Noise 1. The City of Glendale
Page 522 and 523:
4. 5. Light and Glare likely be vis
Page 524 and 525:
4. 5. Light and Glare 3. Outdoor li
Page 526 and 527:
4. 6. Land Use 2. The promotion of
Page 528:
4. 6. Land Use border. adjacent to
Page 536 and 537:
4. 6. Land Use therefore enhance an
Page 539 and 540:
4. 7. Risk of Upset Although there
Page 541 and 542:
56 REDEVELOPMENT PLAN IMPACTS 4. EN
Page 544:
4. 8. Population/Housing moderate i
Page 549:
4. 9. Transportation/Circulation
Page 553 and 554:
Table 12 4. 9. Transportation/Circu
Page 555 and 556:
Table 13 4. 9. Transponation/Circul
Page 560 and 561:
Land Use acre S9.Ft. Animalion Stud
Page 562 and 563:
Project Impacts at Year 2027 4. 9.
Page 565:
Table I7 4. 9. Transportation/Circu
Page 568 and 569:
4. 10. I. Police Therefore, because
Page 571 and 572:
4. 10. 2. Fire 2 1 /2 inches. Fire
Page 573 and 574:
4. 10. 3. Schools classrooms at Dis
Page 575 and 576:
4. 10. 3. Schools would, however, s
Page 577 and 578:
4. 10. 4. Library Although the Drea
Page 579 and 580:
4. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS 4.
Page 581 and 582:
4. 12. 1. Water system due to compl
Page 583 and 584:
REDEVELOPMENT PLAN IMPACTS 4. ENVIR
Page 585 and 586:
MITIGATION MEASURES 4. 12. 2. Sewag
Page 589 and 590:
4. 12. 4. Natural Gas Industrial de
Page 591 and 592:
PROJECT IMPACTS 4. 12. 5. Solid Was
Page 594 and 595:
4. 13. Human Health to expose peopl
Page 596 and 597:
4. 14. Recreation demand for park f
Page 598 and 599:
4. 15. Cultural Resources on-site a
Page 600:
4. 16. Issues Not Included in the F
Page 604:
D. BIOTA LETTERS This Appendix cont
Page 608:
California Department of Fish and G
Page 614:
112 SCALE 1: 24000 o tHISTORIC USGS
Page 620:
LOOKING ACROSS THE LOW AREA TO THE
Page 630:
W:\9553IMU\SKG·D-L.DOC ATTACHMENT
Page 650:
A-2. CALINE ANALYSIS DATA The follo
Page 658:
lENV028Fl.l TIME RATE ADJUSTMENT BA
Page 666:
B-1. HELICOPTER NOISE ASSESSMENT Th
Page 680:
Arup Acoustics Consultants in Acous
Page 684:
Arup Acoustics Ms. Ricarda Bennett
Page 694:
site. B-3. HELICOPTER OPERATIONS LE
Page 700:
Glendale Redevelopment Agency Glenn
Page 704:
TABLE 1 Total Number of Flight Even
Page 710:
ApPENDIX C TRAFFIC VOLUMES AND LANE
Page 720:
C-2. LANE CONFIGURATIONS The follow
Page 731 and 732:
Overall Site Plan, Height, Mass, an
Page 735:
Redevelopment Project Area consiste
Page 738 and 739:
MOTION MOVED BY COMMISSIONER GERO,
Page 740 and 741:
a. The Final Program ElR for the Sa
Page 742:
ATTEST: I, Hassan Haghani, Commissi
show all

UBLIC HEARING: Director of Development ... - City of Glendale

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?