02.07.2013 Views

TABOO: THE ACTUAL MODERNIST AESTHETIC, MADE REAL A ...

TABOO: THE ACTUAL MODERNIST AESTHETIC, MADE REAL A ...

TABOO: THE ACTUAL MODERNIST AESTHETIC, MADE REAL A ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

taboo, as the following remark indicates: ―It…is…certain that<br />

taboo is the primitive form of property. At first emotively and<br />

‗sincerely,‘ then as a legal process, declaring something taboo<br />

would have constituted a title. To appropriate to oneself an object<br />

is to render it sacred and redoubtable to others; it is to make it<br />

‗participate‘ in oneself.‖ N. Guterman, and H. Lefebvre, La<br />

Conscience mystifiée (Paris, 1936) (Arcades 228)<br />

Taboo, under this definition, is the process where names become appropriated as<br />

or by titles. This seemingly capricious definition is justified for Benjamin who considers<br />

that things and their predicating properties are knowable only through a processual<br />

understanding of language that is aimed at uncovering and unfolding the presumption of<br />

sovereign self-participation that titles denote and thusly make ―taboo.‖ ―On Language as<br />

Such and on the Language of Man‖ makes just this point. 2 For Benjamin the process by<br />

which a thing can be made taboo by a title is consanguineous with his sense in which<br />

certain other words become harbingers of our fate. That is, if titles are one kind of word<br />

that man speaks, and in so speaking is able to make something taboo, then the other word<br />

that man speaks is that which belongs to the category of names, and in so speaking man<br />

becomes the harbinger of his own fate. In short, ―the theory of proper names is the theory<br />

of the frontier between finite and infinite language. Of all beings, man is the only one<br />

who names his own kind, as he is the only one whom God did not name…A man‘s name<br />

is his fate‖ (69). The relationship between fate and taboo within the aesthetic practice of<br />

modernist expression – having its origins in the baroque trauerspiel – is the implied<br />

subject matter of much of The Arcades Project, connecting it most immediately to<br />

Benjamin‘s early study of that genre. The two processes – making something taboo by<br />

giving it a title and discovering the fate of man and things in their proper names – are<br />

connected in what Benjamin understands to be ―natural history.‖ The interrelationship of<br />

2

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!