TABOO: THE ACTUAL MODERNIST AESTHETIC, MADE REAL A ...
TABOO: THE ACTUAL MODERNIST AESTHETIC, MADE REAL A ...
TABOO: THE ACTUAL MODERNIST AESTHETIC, MADE REAL A ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
this mystery could only be experienced as the truth that history is essentially transitory<br />
suited Adorno‘s dialectical redefinition of fate within the environs of natural history all<br />
the better.<br />
Benjamin‘s approach to natural history implies an existential strain in its<br />
ontological roots. For Benjamin, allegory allows him to argue that trauerspiel undoes the<br />
classical schematic where nature held a symbolic value as an ahistorical and<br />
universalizing idea. For Adorno, history and nature, once they have been denuded of their<br />
invariants and dialectically re-defined and arranged, raises to view a degree of historical<br />
facticity that is able to release the truth that history and nature are essentially transitory<br />
objects:<br />
Nature itself is transitory. It thus contains within it the moment of<br />
history. Whenever the historical appears, it refers to the natural,<br />
which passes away within it. Conversely, where ―second nature‖<br />
appears, whenever that world of convention confronts us, it is<br />
deciphered by the fact that its meaning becomes clear precisely in<br />
its transitoriness. (TW Adorno. ―The Idea of Natural History‖ 264)<br />
Adorno sees in history and nature the transitoriness that underlies their intra-<br />
compositional dialectic and tends to ignore the problem of the manifest symbol that<br />
distressed Benjamin. Buck-Morss explains that it was this freedom that was original in<br />
the method of argument Adorno would term the ―negative dialectic.‖ The truth that both<br />
nature (after it has been reified) and history contain each of the other‘s transitoriness is<br />
expressed through a critic‘s understanding that that transitoriness has been caused by the<br />
fact that reason and reality do not coincide, making symbolic thought, in its ability to<br />
manifest itself, a red-herring.<br />
Like Buck-Morss, Robert Hullot-Kentor also begins his appraisal of Adorno by<br />
affirming Adorno‘s indebtedness to Benjamin. Adorno and Benjamin, he notes, agree:<br />
170