02.07.2013 Views

TABOO: THE ACTUAL MODERNIST AESTHETIC, MADE REAL A ...

TABOO: THE ACTUAL MODERNIST AESTHETIC, MADE REAL A ...

TABOO: THE ACTUAL MODERNIST AESTHETIC, MADE REAL A ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

this mystery could only be experienced as the truth that history is essentially transitory<br />

suited Adorno‘s dialectical redefinition of fate within the environs of natural history all<br />

the better.<br />

Benjamin‘s approach to natural history implies an existential strain in its<br />

ontological roots. For Benjamin, allegory allows him to argue that trauerspiel undoes the<br />

classical schematic where nature held a symbolic value as an ahistorical and<br />

universalizing idea. For Adorno, history and nature, once they have been denuded of their<br />

invariants and dialectically re-defined and arranged, raises to view a degree of historical<br />

facticity that is able to release the truth that history and nature are essentially transitory<br />

objects:<br />

Nature itself is transitory. It thus contains within it the moment of<br />

history. Whenever the historical appears, it refers to the natural,<br />

which passes away within it. Conversely, where ―second nature‖<br />

appears, whenever that world of convention confronts us, it is<br />

deciphered by the fact that its meaning becomes clear precisely in<br />

its transitoriness. (TW Adorno. ―The Idea of Natural History‖ 264)<br />

Adorno sees in history and nature the transitoriness that underlies their intra-<br />

compositional dialectic and tends to ignore the problem of the manifest symbol that<br />

distressed Benjamin. Buck-Morss explains that it was this freedom that was original in<br />

the method of argument Adorno would term the ―negative dialectic.‖ The truth that both<br />

nature (after it has been reified) and history contain each of the other‘s transitoriness is<br />

expressed through a critic‘s understanding that that transitoriness has been caused by the<br />

fact that reason and reality do not coincide, making symbolic thought, in its ability to<br />

manifest itself, a red-herring.<br />

Like Buck-Morss, Robert Hullot-Kentor also begins his appraisal of Adorno by<br />

affirming Adorno‘s indebtedness to Benjamin. Adorno and Benjamin, he notes, agree:<br />

170

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!