02.07.2013 Views

TABOO: THE ACTUAL MODERNIST AESTHETIC, MADE REAL A ...

TABOO: THE ACTUAL MODERNIST AESTHETIC, MADE REAL A ...

TABOO: THE ACTUAL MODERNIST AESTHETIC, MADE REAL A ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

meaning in the words he appoints to them that gives the Allegorist his winsome faith in a<br />

world beyond the titles that knowledge allows us to possess it through:<br />

As far as the collector is concerned, his collection is never<br />

complete; for let him discover just a single piece missing, and<br />

everything he‘s collected remains a patchwork, which is what<br />

things are for allegory from the beginning. On the other hand, the<br />

allegorist – for whom objects represent only keywords in a secret<br />

dictionary, which will make known their meanings to the initiated<br />

– precisely the allegorist can never have enough of things. With<br />

him, one thing is so little capable of taking the place of another that<br />

no possible reflection suffices to foresee what meaning his<br />

profundity might lay claim for each one of them. [H4a,1] (Arcades<br />

211)<br />

Here, the two-word theory Benjamin described in ―The Role of Language‖ is re-<br />

named and re-purposed: the pure word is appropriated and takes on the force of a legal<br />

judgment over the identity of a thing, offered up for singular possession in the form of a<br />

title or keyword in a mutable Allegorical dictionary. It is the Collector‘s bane to provide<br />

some consonant explanation within and through the world of his or her collection for the<br />

underlying reality of the objects that he collects, unaffected by privative titles. By<br />

providing a title for what it is he is collecting, the Collector provides for himself the<br />

ability to possess and have an object in a tactile manner, inserting it into the physiognomy<br />

of his collection by touch. A title suggests that an object might be so possessed. A title<br />

forces objects to belong to an esoteric order that can be made available to ―initiates‖ of an<br />

allegory aware of its participation within the ruin and patchwork of human knowledge.<br />

That is, a title makes something taboo. Titles, in their legalistic ―primitive form of<br />

property,‖ turn objects into that which is untouchable: ―To appropriate to oneself an<br />

object is to render it sacred and redoubtable to others; it is to make it ‗participate‘ in<br />

oneself‖ (Arcades 207). The Collector, though, is unaffected by this, and does not possess<br />

16

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!