02.07.2013 Views

TABOO: THE ACTUAL MODERNIST AESTHETIC, MADE REAL A ...

TABOO: THE ACTUAL MODERNIST AESTHETIC, MADE REAL A ...

TABOO: THE ACTUAL MODERNIST AESTHETIC, MADE REAL A ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Cantos with Nancy Cunard. The final chapter of this study returns to this first chapter by<br />

interrogating the premises of Benjamin‟s linguistic theory as they were received, refined,<br />

and contested by TW Adorno. This chapter concludes by demonstrating how Benjamin<br />

and Adorno‟s argument over natural history has silently affected our current<br />

understanding of modernist allegory, offering a different inflection into what de-<br />

personalized poetry such as Pound‟s might have to offer to this concept.<br />

What does taboo have to do with it?<br />

Fashionably correct readings of Benjamin‘s theory of language castigate its<br />

essentialism unfairly. Admittedly, it is difficult to overlook the set of assumptions that<br />

allow Benjamin to claim that man‘s word ―overnames‖ God‘s ur-historical Word. These<br />

impoverished understandings of Benjamin‘s theory of language fail to encounter what<br />

that theory holds as its unstated other in that contest between knowledge and truth that<br />

Benjamin describes in the OGT‘s introduction. Is there a way of thinking about language<br />

that Benjamin found to be disagreeably unethical? Being inexorably exiled from the<br />

dignity of being able to speak a pre-lapsarian language grounded in divine intentions<br />

seems to be the only possibility. At the same time, necessary exile enforces a condition of<br />

freedom from worry about linguistic accuracy. As a final solace, we wonder how we<br />

might ever be able to pervert an already fallen and inherently gnomic language?<br />

Benjamin‘s essay, ―On Language as Such and the Language of Man‖ states that<br />

―The human word is the name of things. Hence, it is no longer conceivable, as the<br />

bourgeois view of language maintains, that the word has an accidental relation to its<br />

object, that it is a sign for things (or knowledge of them) agreed by some convention.<br />

12

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!