02.07.2013 Views

TABOO: THE ACTUAL MODERNIST AESTHETIC, MADE REAL A ...

TABOO: THE ACTUAL MODERNIST AESTHETIC, MADE REAL A ...

TABOO: THE ACTUAL MODERNIST AESTHETIC, MADE REAL A ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

terms that this chapter wishes to contend. Benjamin‟s theory of language, as it is refracted<br />

in the section of The Arcades Project entitled “The Collector,” shows us how best to<br />

observe Pound‟s criticial antiquarianism as it serves to reveal the natural history that<br />

taboo occludes.<br />

―Antiquarianism‖ is an amenable term to use when thinking about the imbricated<br />

figures of the Allegorist and the Collector that Benjamin once described:<br />

The allegorist is, as it were, the polar opposite of the collector. He<br />

has given up the attempt to elucidate things through research into<br />

their properties and relations. He dislodges things from their<br />

context and, from the outset, relies on his profundity to illuminate<br />

their meaning. The collector, by contrast, brings together what<br />

belongs together; by keeping in mind their affinities and their<br />

succession in time, he can eventually furnish information about his<br />

objects. Nevertheless – and this is more important than all the<br />

differences that may exist between them – in every collector hides<br />

an allegorist, and in every allegorist a collector. As far as the<br />

collector is concerned, his collection is never complete; for let him<br />

discover just a single piece missing, and everything he‘s collected<br />

remains a patchwork, which is what things are for allegory from<br />

the beginning. On the other hand, the allegorist – for whom objects<br />

represent only keywords in a secret dictionary, which will make<br />

known their meanings to the initiated – precisely the allegorist can<br />

never have enough of things. With him, one thing is so little<br />

capable of taking the place of another that no possible reflection<br />

suffices to foresee what meaning his profundity might lay claim to<br />

for each one of them. [H4a,1] (Arcades 211)<br />

Pound's details, then, wear their invitations to discover their provenance – that to which<br />

they refer in space and time – as well as their means of becoming textualized openly, in<br />

just the manner whereby Collectors and Allegorists share a relationship to the things that<br />

they hold and which hold them in their attention. It is the combination of Pound‘s<br />

awareness of an historical detail‘s provenance and the act of fiction that allows for its<br />

poetic textualization to occur that make Pound‘s works belong amid the antiquarianist<br />

48

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!