02.07.2013 Views

TABOO: THE ACTUAL MODERNIST AESTHETIC, MADE REAL A ...

TABOO: THE ACTUAL MODERNIST AESTHETIC, MADE REAL A ...

TABOO: THE ACTUAL MODERNIST AESTHETIC, MADE REAL A ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

subject. Deleuze's 1977 discussion of psychoanalysis with Claire Parnet, occurring just<br />

after the writing of Anti-Oedipus, offers the most candid evidence of this rejection and<br />

the replacement of the Symbolic order in his thought by the contractual, machinic,<br />

extrinsic, assemblage he calls "desire" (mixing Spinozan/ Erigenean "haecceities" and<br />

Nietzschean "will") that is formed directly between the Imaginary (plane of consistency)<br />

and the Real (field of transcendence) without Symbolic mediation:<br />

Psychoanalysis then has, in effect, its own references and has no<br />

more use for an external ―referent.‖ Everything that happens in<br />

psychoanalysis in the analyst's consulting room is true. What<br />

happens elsewhere is derived or secondary. An excellent method<br />

for encouraging trust. Psychoanalysis has ceased to be an<br />

experimental science in order to get hold of an axiomatic system.<br />

Psychoanalysis, index sui; no other truth than that which emerges<br />

from the operation which presupposes it; the couch has become the<br />

bottomless well, interminable in principle. Psychoanalysis has<br />

stopped being ―in search of‖ because it is now constitutive of<br />

truth...[quotes Serge Leclaire on the contra-rational inflation of<br />

figures into literal behaviors that Psychoanalysis prefers] ... The<br />

psychoanalyst has become like the journalist: he creates the event.<br />

At any rate, psychoanalysis advertises its wares. So long as it<br />

interpreted or so long as it interprets (search for a signified), it<br />

returns desires and utterances to a condition which is deviant by<br />

comparison with the established order, by comparison with<br />

dominant meanings, but by the same token localizes them in the<br />

pores of this dominant, established body, like something which can<br />

be translated and exchanged by virtue of a contract. When it<br />

discovers the signifier, it appeals to a specifically psychoanalytic<br />

order (the symbolic order in opposition to the imaginary order of<br />

the signified), whose only need is itself, because it is statutory or<br />

structural: it is it which develops a body, a corpus sufficient by<br />

itself. Once again we clearly come up against the question of<br />

power[.] (Dialogues 87)<br />

The deployment of multiplicity of meanings over totality and symbol is worth<br />

thinking about, as it touches upon recent theories of the lyric and poetic-subjectivity. The<br />

lyric "I", if we are to take Deleuze‘s anti-Symbolic argument seriously, cannot believe<br />

108

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!