TABOO: THE ACTUAL MODERNIST AESTHETIC, MADE REAL A ...
TABOO: THE ACTUAL MODERNIST AESTHETIC, MADE REAL A ...
TABOO: THE ACTUAL MODERNIST AESTHETIC, MADE REAL A ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
where fate – the agent of nature‟s unintentional naming as well as its directionless force<br />
in time – is absconded by the mythical thinking that preserves and enforces title.<br />
The remainder of this introductory chapter explains Benjamin‟s understanding of<br />
the aesthetics and philosophy I associate with the act of concealment that guarantees<br />
taboo‟s possessiveness, and how this privative tendency can be ameliorated and revealed<br />
through attentiveness to the relationship that obtains between names and titles. To<br />
conclude, I unpack the substance that this kind of attention reveals – natural history. The<br />
next four chapters apply a consideration of the aesthetics that this kind of focused<br />
unseating of taboo eventuates through readings of a selection of Ezra Pound‟s poetry,<br />
alongside those critics/theorists who approach Pound‟s poetry with a set of concerns that<br />
can help expose greater implications of his poetic discovery of the relationship that<br />
obtains between names and titles, that which he would come to understand and theorize<br />
as logopoeia, for Benjamin‟s theory of language.<br />
In many ways Pound‟s work has been done a literal disservice. Quite often, our<br />
reading of his work ignores the obvious and careful interest he had in playing with names<br />
and titles. The first two Pound chapters provide a plain-sense reading of the way titles<br />
and names influence one another. These chapters observe the patterns of reflection that<br />
obtain between the title of Pound‟s 1919 volume of poetry, Quia Pauper Amavi, and the<br />
two long poems it collects, the so called Ur-Cantos (“Three Cantos”) and the “Homage to<br />
Sextus Propertius”. The argument of these two chapters is meant to develop a critical<br />
awareness of the way in which these poems exemplify the poetic condition of de-<br />
personalization, that, as we shall shortly see, Benjamin believed to be an intrinsic<br />
10