TABOO: THE ACTUAL MODERNIST AESTHETIC, MADE REAL A ...
TABOO: THE ACTUAL MODERNIST AESTHETIC, MADE REAL A ...
TABOO: THE ACTUAL MODERNIST AESTHETIC, MADE REAL A ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
CHAPTER FIVE:<br />
―DO YOU WANT ANY MORE OF THIS ARCHAIC INFORMATION ON FOLKS,<br />
UP TO 1745?‖: RETHINKING EZRA POUND‘S ITALIAN RENAISSANCE AS DE-<br />
PERSONALIZED POETIC PRACTICE<br />
If an irony has gone unnoticed it is at least time to mention it here: Benjamin‘s<br />
theory of language and its relationship to taboo is predicated upon an inalienable<br />
contradiction. The purpose of trauerspiel and modernist expression is to deliver unto<br />
natural history its own powers of articulation, free from the taboos that quarantine it in<br />
legal possession and title. Modernist antiquarianism, Benjamin tells us, is amenable to<br />
our understanding of the way giving ourselves names allows us to participate in the<br />
creative capacity of God. Our names are our fate. At the same time, Benjamin argues that<br />
the best way to help nature speak so that it might articulate its own name is to enter into<br />
the productive context of depersonalization. Benjamin, that is, would have us put<br />
ourselves in a situation where we might find the name of fate while, effectively,<br />
foregoing our very own. This irony plays itself out to great effect in Pound‘s work:<br />
whether through a self-conscious narratological technique in the Ur-Cantos, or by<br />
advancing an archaic mode of criticism in Propertius, or by disavowing authorship in<br />
Hugh Selwyn Mauberley altogether. Pound would leave the stage of his poetry as if it<br />
were the effort of some other force than that of his own authorship. Without having to<br />
work out some picayune formalist understanding of autopoiesis – in which it is possible<br />
123