02.07.2013 Views

TABOO: THE ACTUAL MODERNIST AESTHETIC, MADE REAL A ...

TABOO: THE ACTUAL MODERNIST AESTHETIC, MADE REAL A ...

TABOO: THE ACTUAL MODERNIST AESTHETIC, MADE REAL A ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

To define the dialectical terms of each, nature and history, then: nature has a<br />

positive, materialist pole. This pole is concrete and exists as that which is mortal and<br />

transitory, the substance upon which the material of labour and corporeal bodies is<br />

expended. It also has a negative pole. Nature, in this negative pole, is the world that has<br />

not yet been incorporated into history through the penetration of man‘s reason: ―In this<br />

sense, nature was ‗the mythical…that which is eternally there…as the fateful construction<br />

of pre-given being.‘ This was nature‘s static side, perpetuated by the unchanging rituals<br />

of the people who submitted to its domination‖ (Buck-Morss 54). History also has<br />

positive and negative values for Adorno. Positively, history can be known as the dialectic<br />

of social practices; it is the mode of transmitted social behaviours in which the<br />

qualitatively new can be recognized as emerging. Negatively, history has meant the long<br />

story of the same, clothed in circumstantial difference: ―it merely statically reproduced<br />

the conditions and relations of class rather than establishing a qualitatively new order‖<br />

(Buck-Morss 54).<br />

Buck-Morss describes how Martin Heidegger‘s existentialism was that which<br />

Adorno‘s work on natural history was actually aimed at upsetting. Heidegger‘s positing<br />

of ―nature‖ and ―history‖ as terms within the ontological category of ―Dasein‖ erased the<br />

double character that Adorno‘s dialectical definitions were careful to find. With that loss<br />

of the dialectic in Heidegger‘s thought so went the opportunity for negative critique. The<br />

fallacy in Heidegger‘s thought that especially rankled for Adorno was that:<br />

Either social conditions were affirmed as ―natural‖ without regard<br />

for their historical becoming, or the actual historical process was<br />

affirmed as essential; hence the irrational material suffering of<br />

which history was composed was either dismissed as mere<br />

contingency (Hegel) or ontologized as essential in itself<br />

(Heidegger). (Buck-Morss 54)<br />

167

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!