02.07.2013 Views

TABOO: THE ACTUAL MODERNIST AESTHETIC, MADE REAL A ...

TABOO: THE ACTUAL MODERNIST AESTHETIC, MADE REAL A ...

TABOO: THE ACTUAL MODERNIST AESTHETIC, MADE REAL A ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

a diorama booth in which his hero and narrator, Sordello, undergoes changing fortunes as<br />

a troubadour. Sordello is also ―Browning,‖ of course. Pound found this authorial conceit<br />

distasteful for its anachronizing impossibility, but more pointedly rejects it for the effects<br />

on the texture of the historical details that such a posture implied:<br />

The very precision demanded in the etching of those details<br />

prevents them from being subordinated to any unifying principle –<br />

tonal or thematic unity imposed by a single mind, no matter how<br />

creative, tends to diminish the sense of jagged clarity. If the texture<br />

is made smooth... the details cannot stand out sharply. (Schneidau<br />

140)<br />

Schneidau demonstrates his sense of what Pound‘s fragmented narrative means.<br />

Schneidau wants Pound's details to be an extension of his affinity for the ―intuitive<br />

philology‖ of Gaston Paris, Theodore Reinach, and Leo Frobenius, admired at length by<br />

Pound in his essay ―Analysis of this Decade‖ in The New Age Vol. 16, 1915. Pound sees<br />

these figures as foils to the ―bean-counting‖ philology that valued enumerative<br />

philological practice – death by ―multitudinous detail‖ he would say in 1911‘s ―Osiris‖<br />

essay – over glossing cultural meaning.<br />

The consequences of Pound's rejection of the unifying principle of a single<br />

narrative consciousness can be seen most clearly in contemporary theories and debates<br />

surrounding the relationship between writing and documentary research. These help us to<br />

comprehend how we might begin to understand how a de-personalized poetic narrative<br />

can be thought to actually come to pass. Textual critics tend to implement some limited<br />

use of authorship in their apprehension of poetic works, whereas genetic critics take a<br />

more rigorous approach to the definition of a draft – a term Pound was always careful to<br />

use about his poetry (after the bullying he took from classics scholars for his translation<br />

60

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!