TABOO: THE ACTUAL MODERNIST AESTHETIC, MADE REAL A ...
TABOO: THE ACTUAL MODERNIST AESTHETIC, MADE REAL A ...
TABOO: THE ACTUAL MODERNIST AESTHETIC, MADE REAL A ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
a diorama booth in which his hero and narrator, Sordello, undergoes changing fortunes as<br />
a troubadour. Sordello is also ―Browning,‖ of course. Pound found this authorial conceit<br />
distasteful for its anachronizing impossibility, but more pointedly rejects it for the effects<br />
on the texture of the historical details that such a posture implied:<br />
The very precision demanded in the etching of those details<br />
prevents them from being subordinated to any unifying principle –<br />
tonal or thematic unity imposed by a single mind, no matter how<br />
creative, tends to diminish the sense of jagged clarity. If the texture<br />
is made smooth... the details cannot stand out sharply. (Schneidau<br />
140)<br />
Schneidau demonstrates his sense of what Pound‘s fragmented narrative means.<br />
Schneidau wants Pound's details to be an extension of his affinity for the ―intuitive<br />
philology‖ of Gaston Paris, Theodore Reinach, and Leo Frobenius, admired at length by<br />
Pound in his essay ―Analysis of this Decade‖ in The New Age Vol. 16, 1915. Pound sees<br />
these figures as foils to the ―bean-counting‖ philology that valued enumerative<br />
philological practice – death by ―multitudinous detail‖ he would say in 1911‘s ―Osiris‖<br />
essay – over glossing cultural meaning.<br />
The consequences of Pound's rejection of the unifying principle of a single<br />
narrative consciousness can be seen most clearly in contemporary theories and debates<br />
surrounding the relationship between writing and documentary research. These help us to<br />
comprehend how we might begin to understand how a de-personalized poetic narrative<br />
can be thought to actually come to pass. Textual critics tend to implement some limited<br />
use of authorship in their apprehension of poetic works, whereas genetic critics take a<br />
more rigorous approach to the definition of a draft – a term Pound was always careful to<br />
use about his poetry (after the bullying he took from classics scholars for his translation<br />
60