TABOO: THE ACTUAL MODERNIST AESTHETIC, MADE REAL A ...
TABOO: THE ACTUAL MODERNIST AESTHETIC, MADE REAL A ...
TABOO: THE ACTUAL MODERNIST AESTHETIC, MADE REAL A ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
of Propertius). The signature of authorship is a meaningless event for genetic critics<br />
working on authorial drafts. Authorship, they argue, makes sense only if publication is<br />
introduced as the overriding logic and principle of the organic growth of the text.<br />
Geneticists study drafts for their usefulness in locating moments when objects of<br />
authorial interest – either of their own device or citations from other sources – move from<br />
being probable avenues for further development into more regulatory schema, guiding<br />
large-scale directions and thematic affinities in a text's development. Geneticists posit<br />
textual teleologies without finalist, authorial, supposition. They focus on the<br />
appropriation of empirical potentialities by the organic forces and processes that go on to<br />
eventuate textual unities. Theirs is the study of the struggle between inspiration and<br />
appropriation:<br />
Rough drafts demonstrate perfectly how, even for the most realist<br />
of writers, the will to referential veracity remains secondary to the<br />
organic primacy of the work: selected first of all for its realityfactor-value,<br />
the exogenetic detail is forced into the original<br />
context of the rough draft; but as the endogenetic logic develops,<br />
the writer can be seen abandoning, one after the other, over the<br />
course of the composition, all the realist characteristics that had<br />
been the initial reason for choosing such a demonstrative detail. As<br />
it meshes better and better with its context, the detail sometimes<br />
ends up becoming utterly unrealistic, if it doesn't simply run<br />
aground. (Pierre-Marc DeBiasi and Ingrid Wassenar 46)<br />
What Pound accomplishes is an extraordinary upset of the ―organic‖ force of his<br />
own work's primacy when he rejects Browning's monological narrator for the ―realist<br />
characteristics that had been the initial reason for choosing such [a] demonstrative<br />
detail[s].‖ Surveying a broken landscape of historical time, Pound transforms the usual<br />
logic of textual appropriation described by DeBiasi and Wassenar that obtains between<br />
the realist detail, open to verification in the referential world from which it is drawn, and<br />
61