02.07.2013 Views

TABOO: THE ACTUAL MODERNIST AESTHETIC, MADE REAL A ...

TABOO: THE ACTUAL MODERNIST AESTHETIC, MADE REAL A ...

TABOO: THE ACTUAL MODERNIST AESTHETIC, MADE REAL A ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

of Propertius). The signature of authorship is a meaningless event for genetic critics<br />

working on authorial drafts. Authorship, they argue, makes sense only if publication is<br />

introduced as the overriding logic and principle of the organic growth of the text.<br />

Geneticists study drafts for their usefulness in locating moments when objects of<br />

authorial interest – either of their own device or citations from other sources – move from<br />

being probable avenues for further development into more regulatory schema, guiding<br />

large-scale directions and thematic affinities in a text's development. Geneticists posit<br />

textual teleologies without finalist, authorial, supposition. They focus on the<br />

appropriation of empirical potentialities by the organic forces and processes that go on to<br />

eventuate textual unities. Theirs is the study of the struggle between inspiration and<br />

appropriation:<br />

Rough drafts demonstrate perfectly how, even for the most realist<br />

of writers, the will to referential veracity remains secondary to the<br />

organic primacy of the work: selected first of all for its realityfactor-value,<br />

the exogenetic detail is forced into the original<br />

context of the rough draft; but as the endogenetic logic develops,<br />

the writer can be seen abandoning, one after the other, over the<br />

course of the composition, all the realist characteristics that had<br />

been the initial reason for choosing such a demonstrative detail. As<br />

it meshes better and better with its context, the detail sometimes<br />

ends up becoming utterly unrealistic, if it doesn't simply run<br />

aground. (Pierre-Marc DeBiasi and Ingrid Wassenar 46)<br />

What Pound accomplishes is an extraordinary upset of the ―organic‖ force of his<br />

own work's primacy when he rejects Browning's monological narrator for the ―realist<br />

characteristics that had been the initial reason for choosing such [a] demonstrative<br />

detail[s].‖ Surveying a broken landscape of historical time, Pound transforms the usual<br />

logic of textual appropriation described by DeBiasi and Wassenar that obtains between<br />

the realist detail, open to verification in the referential world from which it is drawn, and<br />

61

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!