TABOO: THE ACTUAL MODERNIST AESTHETIC, MADE REAL A ...
TABOO: THE ACTUAL MODERNIST AESTHETIC, MADE REAL A ...
TABOO: THE ACTUAL MODERNIST AESTHETIC, MADE REAL A ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
interesting, a rapprochement is necessary in order to confront the conclusions she draws<br />
about poetic-subjectivity and impersonality. This rapprochement extends into a wider<br />
look at the work of Virginia Jackson who shares similar critical pre-dispositions to<br />
Blasing and Cameron in her discussion of lyricism and subjectivity.<br />
Listening closely to the phonemic play in the Cantos for the "lyric" connections<br />
that lie outside their content, Blasing values Pound's poetry for its ideological "fluidity"<br />
but regards it to be the accidental by-product of his intent. Her theories of ―metaleptic‖<br />
subject-formation, caused by the ontological priorness of the "mother-tongue," and the<br />
ensuing protraction of authorial intention to what it is that constitutes the "real" history<br />
that delivers this tongue, allows her to dismiss Pound's avowed intentions to demonstrate<br />
historical repetition and the details that illumine the actual conditions that he may have<br />
thought to be governing cultural production. Here is the conclusion she draws after<br />
reading Canto 71, an Adams Canto:<br />
The prevailing defense of the Cantos is that its epic openness and<br />
polyvocality save the poem from being a totalitarian text, which, in<br />
the standard reading, is aligned with "lyric closure." But we always<br />
only hear other voices as edited by Pound. My argument is that<br />
lyric language, which is "open" to a different history, keeps the<br />
poem ideologically fluid. The text has a kind of negative capability<br />
because it allows language to organize in a fashion that undoes<br />
tendentious messages. To motivate the signifier, the lyric listens to<br />
the words otherwise, and if we listen to words otherwise, we hear a<br />
different Adams - or, more accurately, different Adamses - than the<br />
one he [Pound] would like to leave for the record. (Lyric Poetry<br />
161)<br />
Blasing draws new implications from the timbre of Pound's ―voice,‖ at the<br />
expense of his intent: "[b]ut we always only hear other voices edited by Pound" (162).<br />
Whether this is true or not is beside the point. Pound's version of subjectivity makes the<br />
103