TABOO: THE ACTUAL MODERNIST AESTHETIC, MADE REAL A ...
TABOO: THE ACTUAL MODERNIST AESTHETIC, MADE REAL A ...
TABOO: THE ACTUAL MODERNIST AESTHETIC, MADE REAL A ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
the bibliographic code, delicate as his comparisons to other lettering choices and font<br />
types used in Pound's publication history may be. McGann, that is, must read the title in<br />
order to suggest that Pound‘s utopianism was also dangerously aligned with sadder<br />
fascinations. This transgression is sustained within the larger argument that McGann<br />
makes about how the protocols of interpretation appear to be governed by the publication<br />
history of Pound's texts: ―[T]he Cantos will want to preserve the integrity of those<br />
separate parts – which are, after all, devices for organizing the reading experience. New<br />
Directions and Faber have always preserved the distinctions by printing the first thirty<br />
cantos as a single unit‖ (134-5). McGann's attentions to Pound's conservative approach to<br />
publication allow him to argue against maintaining a liberal distinction between editing<br />
and interpretation:<br />
I bring up this matter of textual and editorial theory because the<br />
case of the Cantos illustrates in the most dramatic ways the<br />
difficulty, if not the impossibility, of separating textual/editorial<br />
work from critical/interpretive work. A decision about how to treat<br />
the physical presentation of Cantos 1-30 in an edition will<br />
drastically affect how the work is read and understood. (Textual<br />
Condition 135)<br />
The antecedent continuum from which the bibliographic and semantic codes are<br />
inseparably expressed is something like, in McGann's terms, ―the socio-materiality of<br />
things.‖ Granting that Pound did have such aims in mind for each of his work's iterations,<br />
it is certainly incumbent upon us to concur that Pound's sensitivity to the sociomateriality<br />
of his poetry entered directly into the garden of his poetic text. McGann concludes that in<br />
order to preserve the rich sociomaterial instances of the Cantos we must be aware of how<br />
Pound has already carefully selected their means and modes of best publication. We<br />
want, that is, to be cognizant of the editorial horizons each title signals towards the<br />
53