20.07.2013 Views

Positional Neutralization - Linguistics - University of California ...

Positional Neutralization - Linguistics - University of California ...

Positional Neutralization - Linguistics - University of California ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

well-known, for example, that shorter vowels are more likely to devoice than longer<br />

vowels (presumably because the duration and robustness <strong>of</strong> the necessary vocal-fold<br />

adduction gesture is sufficient to prevent longer vowels being overlapped by neighboring<br />

voiceless segments or falling victim to complete devoicing as a result <strong>of</strong> decreased<br />

subglottal pressure). Word-final vowels, though perhaps produced without the phrase-<br />

final drop in subglottal pressure, are also produced without phrase-final lengthening.<br />

Without this lengthening and a following phrase boundary, in many languages word-final<br />

vowels can actually be among the shortest possible in the system, making them<br />

susceptible to elision in hiatus contexts or interconsonantal devoicing <strong>of</strong> the same sort<br />

discussed by Gordon for word-internal vowels. In Major’s study <strong>of</strong> Brazilian Portuguese<br />

timing patterns (1981), di- and trisyllabic nonsense forms <strong>of</strong> the segmental shape [lala] or<br />

[lalala] situated in phrase medial contexts were realized (for a single speaker) with the<br />

following durational patterns:<br />

(27) Mean vowel durations in Brazilian Portuguese di- and trisyllables (Major 1981)<br />

token vowel durations in ms<br />

v1 v2 v3<br />

a. /lalá/ 151 222<br />

/lála/ 217 114<br />

b. /lalála/ 138 202 108<br />

/lálala/ 208 122 99<br />

197

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!