20.07.2013 Views

Positional Neutralization - Linguistics - University of California ...

Positional Neutralization - Linguistics - University of California ...

Positional Neutralization - Linguistics - University of California ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

fricatives, which in retrospect may have been an error, since these too are known to<br />

impact negatively the durations <strong>of</strong> following vowels. The number <strong>of</strong> such tokens,<br />

however, was relatively small, and evenly distributed between initial-syllable and second<br />

syllable tokens. All target vowels occurred in open syllables, again with an eye to<br />

reducing non-position-dependent durational variation. (42) shows a pair <strong>of</strong> tokens<br />

illustrating the two types <strong>of</strong> stimuli.<br />

(42) Syllable 1 vs. Syllable 2<br />

màcerabílity anàphrodísiac<br />

Each token was situated in three different frame sentences selected to place the target<br />

word in initial position in a variety <strong>of</strong> prosodic domains à la Fougeron and Keating 1996.<br />

The relevant domains were Utterance, Phonological Phrase, and Phonological Word. This<br />

is shown in (43).<br />

(43) Prosodic Environments<br />

a. Utterance-initial: U[Phr[X is an interesting topic.<br />

b. Phonological Phrase-initial: U[Phr[I think]Phr[X is an interesting topic.<br />

c. Word-initial: U[Phr[Y X compound] is an interesting topic.<br />

e.g. fish macerability, frog anaphrodisiacs, toe lacerability, plan irrationality<br />

Participants were two native speakers <strong>of</strong> North American English raised in the<br />

northeastern United States, one male and one female. Speakers read the test sentences<br />

313

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!