20.07.2013 Views

Positional Neutralization - Linguistics - University of California ...

Positional Neutralization - Linguistics - University of California ...

Positional Neutralization - Linguistics - University of California ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

UVR, the two opposing sets <strong>of</strong> vowels, stressed and unstressed, are by definition in<br />

complementary distribution. Long and short vowels in, e.g., Slovene, are a different<br />

matter. They may both occur in stressed and unstressed syllables, and because <strong>of</strong> the<br />

potential for paradigmatic contrast <strong>of</strong> this sort (unavailable in UVR systems), they may<br />

exert pressure on one another in the manner that high vowels and mid vowels <strong>of</strong> the same<br />

quantity may also, potentially occasioning chain shifts and the like. That such a merger<br />

should take place in the short vowel inventory <strong>of</strong> Slovene dialects is interesting 11 , and the<br />

fact that similar mergers seem absent from UVR systems points out a potential difference<br />

in the relationship between long and short and stressed and unstressed vowel inventories,<br />

but this is just one <strong>of</strong> many differences we do not yet fully understand (see Steriade 1994:<br />

14 and 22 for some notes here) in the development <strong>of</strong> these systems.<br />

One clear difference here is that long vowel inventories are routinely both larger<br />

and smaller than short vowel inventories, while in UVR systems stressed inventories are<br />

rarely if ever smaller than unstressed. Languages with contradictory patterns from this<br />

point <strong>of</strong> view listed in Maddieson (1984) include Telefol (long /i, , a, , u/, short /i, a,<br />

u/) and Chipewyan (long /i:, a:, u:/, short /i, e, a, o, u/. Obviously in each instance<br />

radically different factors may have contributed to the development <strong>of</strong> the systems in<br />

11 Doubly so in fact for this being the second occurrence <strong>of</strong> this sound change in the history <strong>of</strong> the language,<br />

the first instance being in common with Serbo-Croatian the merger <strong>of</strong> the overshort Late Common Slavic<br />

Jer vowels (originally short /i/ and /u/), yielding Slovenian // and SCr. /a/.<br />

46

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!