20.07.2013 Views

Positional Neutralization - Linguistics - University of California ...

Positional Neutralization - Linguistics - University of California ...

Positional Neutralization - Linguistics - University of California ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

(45) [pHa»pHatja] chamomile<br />

Here the strong aspiration <strong>of</strong> the initial labial stop is clear. It is in fact substantially<br />

stronger than that found in the onset <strong>of</strong> the stressed second syllable 121 . The longer<br />

duration <strong>of</strong> the second vowel is due to syllable structure, closed syllables hosting longer<br />

vowels than open syllables in Turkish (Kopkallı-Yavuz 2001, Barnes 2001b. I suspect<br />

that it is this initial-consonant strengthening, combined with the vocalic effect presented<br />

below, with is being heard and interpreted as an initial “dynamic stress” in Modern<br />

Turkish by some scholars, as detailed above. The fact that it continues to occur in words<br />

like [pHa»pHatja], where the adjacent penult is unequivocally stressed (or receives what<br />

Johanson would call the pitch accent and possibly “dynamic stress” as well 122 ), makes it<br />

unlikely that an accent or secondary stress is somehow involved. Given the generality <strong>of</strong><br />

121<br />

In Turkish as in English, both word-initial and stressed-syllable-initial voiceless stops receive strong<br />

aspiration.<br />

122<br />

See Konrot (1981) for discussion <strong>of</strong> the possibility that while Turkish final stress is cued solely by F0,<br />

the non-final stress <strong>of</strong> borrowings and toponyms may actually be cued by both pitch and amplitude (though<br />

not duration).<br />

316

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!