20.07.2013 Views

Positional Neutralization - Linguistics - University of California ...

Positional Neutralization - Linguistics - University of California ...

Positional Neutralization - Linguistics - University of California ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

patterns are examples <strong>of</strong> the latter. To avoid confusion with terminology used in earlier<br />

chapters here, I will substitute <strong>Positional</strong> Strength for Smith’s <strong>Positional</strong> <strong>Neutralization</strong>.<br />

The issue is purely practical and should not be taken to bear theoretical significance. One<br />

example <strong>of</strong> a <strong>Positional</strong> Augmentation pattern in initial syllables is the relatively common<br />

demand for low-sonority onsets in initial or stressed syllable onsets, which has the result<br />

<strong>of</strong> causing fewer consonantal contrasts to be licensed in those positions. Another would<br />

be the demand for long or high-sonority vowels under stress, discussed in Chapter 2 and<br />

also in Chapter 3 in the context <strong>of</strong> final vowel lowering.<br />

4.1.2. Previous proposals for the motivation <strong>of</strong> PN in stressed and initial syllables<br />

Both Beckman 1998 and Smith 2002 divide strong positions into the phonetically<br />

strong (i.e. stressed syllables), and the psycholinguistically strong (i.e. initial syllables,<br />

roots). For Beckman little follows from this classification. Smith pursues this dichotomy<br />

further and examines the potential effect the source or nature <strong>of</strong> a position’s phonological<br />

strength may have on the typological patterning <strong>of</strong> the licensing asymmetries found<br />

therein. Smith’s prediction is essentially the following: a position which is phonetically-<br />

strong may show both <strong>Positional</strong> Strength and <strong>Positional</strong> Augmentation effects, since<br />

phonetic strengthening can have the effect <strong>of</strong> both exempting a position from lenitions or<br />

reductions (as with final resistance to VR) and also itself <strong>of</strong> effacing contrasts by, e.g.,<br />

280

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!