20.07.2013 Views

Positional Neutralization - Linguistics - University of California ...

Positional Neutralization - Linguistics - University of California ...

Positional Neutralization - Linguistics - University of California ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

a wider specification allows the influence <strong>of</strong> contextual factors to be felt more strongly,<br />

resulting in gradient or contingent instantiations <strong>of</strong> certain features or processes. In the<br />

case <strong>of</strong> devoicing and glottalization, it has been necessary to distinguish even complete<br />

lack <strong>of</strong> a specified target or gesture from the presence <strong>of</strong> such a target, however variable<br />

in implementation. In the case <strong>of</strong> phonetic underspecification (whether we mean<br />

complete lack <strong>of</strong> a specified target, as with passive devoicing, or only having a broad<br />

target window, like gradient), the realization <strong>of</strong> the feature or features in question will be<br />

to some extent automatically interpolated, either as a function <strong>of</strong> the realization <strong>of</strong> other<br />

features (e.g. duration), or as transitions between two specified points along a continuum<br />

<strong>of</strong> potential targets for the same feature (i.e. pitch). Importantly though, both are tokens<br />

<strong>of</strong> the same phonetic feature, broadly conceived. A partially or completely underspecified<br />

realization results in a broad continuum <strong>of</strong> potential degrees <strong>of</strong> instantiation <strong>of</strong> a<br />

particular feature, while a narrowly specified feature singles out a small portion <strong>of</strong> that<br />

continuum <strong>of</strong> possible realizations as optimal. In the case <strong>of</strong> the phonologizations above,<br />

however, the specified and underspecified variants are instances <strong>of</strong> two completely<br />

distinct types from an articulatory point <strong>of</strong> view (in that the gestures needed to make<br />

them are largely mutually incompatible). If our phonetic component contains<br />

representations <strong>of</strong> acoustic features or properties, <strong>of</strong> course, then the problem is more<br />

tractable; both types <strong>of</strong> glottalization can be represented in acoustic terms according to<br />

222

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!