20.07.2013 Views

Positional Neutralization - Linguistics - University of California ...

Positional Neutralization - Linguistics - University of California ...

Positional Neutralization - Linguistics - University of California ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

3.7.2. Final short vowel avoidance<br />

As much as Buckley is correct in seeing a crosslinguistic tendency for languages<br />

to avoid contrastively long vowels in word-final position, and despite the fact that at least<br />

some languages (e.g. Dutch) clearly have the means <strong>of</strong> implementing final lengthening<br />

even in cases where the final vowel itself is resistant to the process, there is nonetheless<br />

an equally clear tendency for languages to avoid certain short vowels in word-final<br />

position as well. Johnson and Martin (2001) note in passing that Korean, Tigrinya and<br />

Tigre all disallow final [], while Moroccan Arabic prohibits final []. To these examples<br />

we may add the following:<br />

(40) Avoidance <strong>of</strong> final short vowels<br />

a. Eastern Mari (Finno-Ugric, Sebeok and Ingemann 1961, Flemming 1993,<br />

Kangasmaa-Minn 1998, Majors 1998): The reduced vowel [] does not appear in word-<br />

final position. See above, section 3.2.3. for details.<br />

b. Sulaimania Kurdish (Iranian, Ahmad 1986, McCarus 1997): No short (lax) high<br />

/, / in word-final open syllables.<br />

271

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!