20.07.2013 Views

Positional Neutralization - Linguistics - University of California ...

Positional Neutralization - Linguistics - University of California ...

Positional Neutralization - Linguistics - University of California ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

since it too brings the phonetic forces which shape phonological patterns diachronically<br />

directly into their implementations in synchrony. By linking the licensing patterns<br />

directly to the phonetic effects which cause them, these approaches avoid the vast<br />

overgeneration characteristic <strong>of</strong> the phonetics-free, abstract phonological model.<br />

1.1.4. Neo-Grounded Phonology<br />

Attempts to chart a third path in accounting for positional neutralization patterns<br />

include the approaches <strong>of</strong> Hayes (1997) and Smith (2002), both <strong>of</strong> which owe a great deal<br />

to the Grounded Phonology approach <strong>of</strong> Archangeli and Pulleyblank (1994). According<br />

to Smith, for example, phonological positions and features are combined as before to<br />

form PN-inducing constraints, only now, before incorporation into the grammar, they are<br />

subject to screening by a set <strong>of</strong> phonetically-sensitive substantive filters which endorse<br />

constraints reflecting articulatory or perceptual reality in some way and reject<br />

combinations <strong>of</strong> features and positions not grounded in this manner. These filters are said<br />

to constitute a sort <strong>of</strong> “meta-grammar” <strong>of</strong> constraint construction. This approach holds<br />

the specter <strong>of</strong> phonetic detail in phonology at bay while incorporating some <strong>of</strong> the<br />

restrictiveness <strong>of</strong> the Licensing-by-Cue model into the theory.<br />

13

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!