20.07.2013 Views

Positional Neutralization - Linguistics - University of California ...

Positional Neutralization - Linguistics - University of California ...

Positional Neutralization - Linguistics - University of California ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

asymmetries are relatively unambiguous (dramatic durational asymmetries between<br />

stressed and unstressed syllables in the languages in question), the phonological<br />

neutralization patterns found there are likewise fairly unequivocal. In the case <strong>of</strong> final<br />

syllables, however, where the phonetic situation is more complicated and variable, the<br />

phonological status <strong>of</strong> the final syllable with respect to the licensing <strong>of</strong> contrast is just as<br />

complex, making final syllables strong for some contrasts in some languages, and weak<br />

for the same or other contrasts in other languages. The ambiguous status <strong>of</strong> the final<br />

syllable presents a strong argument against the notion <strong>of</strong> strength or weakness <strong>of</strong><br />

licensing potential as inherently determined primitives in Universal Grammar. Whether<br />

phonological strong or weak licensing effects are ultimately phonologized in a given<br />

position for a given feature in a given language will depend on the language-specific<br />

phonetic characteristics expressed in the relevant position.<br />

The recurrence <strong>of</strong> certain patterns in the phonology is entirely a function <strong>of</strong> the<br />

recurrence in the phonetics <strong>of</strong> the input patterns to the phonologization there<strong>of</strong>. It is at<br />

this phonetic level then where the task <strong>of</strong> explaining the origins <strong>of</strong> these potentially<br />

universal patterns becomes meaningful 4 . The recurrence <strong>of</strong> the phonetic patterns together<br />

with the reinterpretative mechanism <strong>of</strong> phonologization, on the other hand, insures that<br />

4<br />

I refer here only to aspects <strong>of</strong> sound patterns in which issues <strong>of</strong> naturalness or phonetic content are<br />

concerned <strong>of</strong> course. I do not mean to suggest that the phonological grammar does not or cannot make<br />

demands <strong>of</strong> its own on the processes it implements. Only that the existence <strong>of</strong> such restrictions should be<br />

demonstrated to be necessary, rather than assumed a priori.<br />

15

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!