20.07.2013 Views

Positional Neutralization - Linguistics - University of California ...

Positional Neutralization - Linguistics - University of California ...

Positional Neutralization - Linguistics - University of California ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

is 121 ms long (measured conservatively). The stressed vowel has a duration <strong>of</strong> 119 ms<br />

and the pretonic 106 ms. The (relatively late-occurring) F1 maximum for the final vowel<br />

is 568 Hz, with an F2 <strong>of</strong> 1239 Hz. A short study <strong>of</strong> formant values for unstressed /a/ in 63<br />

open first pretonic syllables (in non-nasal contexts followed by voiced or voiceless<br />

obstruents) from the speaker producing the spectrogram above (a Leningrad native)<br />

yielded a mean F1 <strong>of</strong> 555 Hz and a mean F2 <strong>of</strong> 1216 Hz, placing the values for the final<br />

vowel <strong>of</strong> this token well within the speakers range for Degree 1 reduction (see Chapter<br />

2). The unreduced stressed /a/ in this token, as expected, has a higher F1: 608 Hz, with an<br />

F2 <strong>of</strong> 1308 (a bit high, probably due to the surrounding coronals). The final is then<br />

clearly resistant to reduction in the sense outlined above. It also has a low amplitude,<br />

dropping <strong>of</strong>f drastically toward the end. The irregular wide spacing <strong>of</strong> the glottal pulses<br />

together with the variations in their amplitudes indicates (audible) creaky phonation 92 ,<br />

and the very final portion <strong>of</strong> the vowel appears to devoice slightly before the pause. All<br />

this suggests the low subglottal pressure we expect to find in phrase-final syllables (see<br />

below for the less-than-obvious reason this should be the case for creaky voice).<br />

As noted, the coexistence <strong>of</strong> low subglottal pressure (with concomitant devoicing)<br />

and final lengthening (with concomitant supralaryngeal gestural strengthening), while not<br />

91 This spectrogram and all the attendant analysis was made using the Praat 4.0.2 speech analysis s<strong>of</strong>tware<br />

(Copyright@1992-2001 by Paul Boersma and David Weenink). Formant measures were taken using LPC<br />

autocorrelation analysis.<br />

92 Itself actually potentially contributing some raising <strong>of</strong> F1 in this example (Gordon and Ladefoged 2001).<br />

206

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!