Whitefly and whitefly-borne viruses in the tropics : Building a ... - cgiar
Whitefly and whitefly-borne viruses in the tropics : Building a ... - cgiar
Whitefly and whitefly-borne viruses in the tropics : Building a ... - cgiar
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Priority cassava pests listed by<br />
farmers were vertebrates (16%), weeds<br />
(13%), termites <strong>and</strong> weevils (10% each)<br />
<strong>and</strong> CMD (6%). Overall, CMD <strong>in</strong>cidence<br />
was ma<strong>in</strong>ly attributable to cutt<strong>in</strong>g<br />
<strong>in</strong>fection (Figure 2). The <strong>in</strong>cidence of<br />
cutt<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>fection averaged 60% <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
ra<strong>in</strong>forest, 55% <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> transition forest,<br />
63% <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> coastal savannah <strong>and</strong> 51%<br />
<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> wet savannah. The <strong>in</strong>cidence of<br />
<strong>whitefly</strong> <strong>in</strong>fection, transformed to allow<br />
for <strong>the</strong> effect of multiple <strong>in</strong>fection<br />
(Gregory, 1948), was significantly<br />
higher <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> coastal savannah <strong>and</strong><br />
ra<strong>in</strong>forest than <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> transition forest<br />
or wet savannah (t > 2.9; P < 0.05).<br />
<strong>Whitefly</strong> abundance showed no<br />
correlation with <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>cidence of<br />
<strong>whitefly</strong> <strong>in</strong>fection. In terms of reduc<strong>in</strong>g<br />
CMD <strong>in</strong>cidence, <strong>the</strong> transition forest<br />
<strong>and</strong> wet savannah would seem to<br />
provide better sites for multiplication of<br />
clean plant<strong>in</strong>g material.<br />
Percentage of plants<br />
with CMD symptoms<br />
<strong>Whitefly</strong> <strong>in</strong>fection Cutt<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>fection<br />
Figure 2. Cassava mosaic disease (CMD)<br />
<strong>in</strong>cidence <strong>and</strong> source of <strong>in</strong>fection <strong>in</strong><br />
<strong>the</strong> ecozones of Ghana.<br />
26<br />
100<br />
80<br />
60<br />
40<br />
20<br />
0<br />
Coastal<br />
savannah<br />
Ra<strong>in</strong>forest<br />
Transition<br />
forest<br />
Wet<br />
savannah<br />
Across ecozones, 24%-32% of<br />
plants showed no CMD symptoms.<br />
About 10% of <strong>the</strong> plants showed<br />
serious (score 4) to severe (score 5)<br />
damage symptoms (Figure 3). The<br />
plants were 3-6 months old, a growth<br />
stage dur<strong>in</strong>g which storage root<br />
formation <strong>and</strong> development is <strong>in</strong>itiated<br />
<strong>and</strong> root yield is particularly vulnerable<br />
Whiteflies <strong>and</strong> <strong>Whitefly</strong>-<strong>borne</strong> Viruses <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Tropics<br />
to pest-<strong>in</strong>duced losses. In view of <strong>the</strong><br />
higher proportion of plants <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
moderate <strong>and</strong> severe damage categories<br />
<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> transition forest, significant root<br />
yield losses could be expected <strong>in</strong> this<br />
ecozone. However, yield loss estimates<br />
provided by farmers appeared to be<br />
unrealistically high. For example, about<br />
26% of farmers estimated losses at<br />
50% <strong>and</strong> 20% of farmers at 75%. Such<br />
loss estimates would need to be<br />
validated, especially s<strong>in</strong>ce 91% of <strong>the</strong><br />
farmers reported that <strong>the</strong>y sell <strong>the</strong>ir<br />
cassava harvest.<br />
Percentage of plants with<br />
different CMD severities<br />
100<br />
90<br />
80<br />
70<br />
60<br />
50<br />
40<br />
30<br />
20<br />
10<br />
0<br />
Slight<br />
damage<br />
Ra<strong>in</strong>forest<br />
Wet savannah<br />
Moderate<br />
damage<br />
Serious<br />
damage<br />
Transition forest<br />
Coastal savannah<br />
Figure 3. Cassava mosaic disease (CMD)<br />
damage severity <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> ecozones of<br />
Ghana.<br />
Farmers’ op<strong>in</strong>ion was almost<br />
equally divided on whe<strong>the</strong>r or not CMD<br />
was becom<strong>in</strong>g more severe, <strong>and</strong> a<br />
sizeable proportion (34%) considered<br />
that <strong>the</strong> disease was not a yearly<br />
occurrence. Extension <strong>and</strong> tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g<br />
support for <strong>whitefly</strong>/CMD problems<br />
appeared low, s<strong>in</strong>ce 89% of farmers<br />
reported receiv<strong>in</strong>g no technical<br />
<strong>in</strong>formation or assistance with <strong>the</strong>se<br />
problems. In view of this, it is not<br />
surpris<strong>in</strong>g that only 1% of farmers<br />
practiced any deliberate <strong>whitefly</strong>/CMD<br />
control. Local varieties predom<strong>in</strong>ated<br />
(54% site <strong>in</strong>cidence) <strong>and</strong> 18% of <strong>the</strong><br />
farmers ranked Busum<strong>in</strong>sia as <strong>the</strong>ir<br />
s<strong>in</strong>gle most preferred variety, followed<br />
by three o<strong>the</strong>r local varieties, Santom