23.07.2013 Views

Whitefly and whitefly-borne viruses in the tropics : Building a ... - cgiar

Whitefly and whitefly-borne viruses in the tropics : Building a ... - cgiar

Whitefly and whitefly-borne viruses in the tropics : Building a ... - cgiar

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

of which 58 were B. tabaci <strong>and</strong> 12 were<br />

B. afer. Only 35 <strong>whitefly</strong> samples were<br />

identified from sweetpotato<br />

(attributable to <strong>the</strong> lower populations<br />

on that crop), compris<strong>in</strong>g 31 B. tabaci<br />

<strong>and</strong> four B. afer. The two species<br />

occurred throughout <strong>the</strong> three target<br />

areas.<br />

Adult <strong>whitefly</strong> populations were<br />

relatively low on both cassava <strong>and</strong><br />

sweetpotato (Table 1). Whiteflies on<br />

cassava were more numerous <strong>in</strong> Coast<br />

Prov<strong>in</strong>ce, while whiteflies on<br />

sweetpotato were more abundant <strong>in</strong><br />

Nyanza Prov<strong>in</strong>ce. Mean adult <strong>whitefly</strong><br />

numbers ranged from 0.2 to 2.9 per<br />

top five leaves on cassava <strong>and</strong> 0.5 to<br />

4.4 per m<strong>in</strong>ute count on sweetpotato <strong>in</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> surveyed regions (see also Figure 2,<br />

Chapter 1.14, this volume).<br />

Disease <strong>in</strong>cidence <strong>and</strong><br />

symptom severity<br />

Mean CMD <strong>in</strong>cidence <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> surveyed<br />

regions was 51.3% <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>cidence was<br />

highest <strong>in</strong> Western Prov<strong>in</strong>ce <strong>and</strong> lowest<br />

<strong>in</strong> Nyanza (Table 1). Diseased cutt<strong>in</strong>gs<br />

provided <strong>the</strong> ma<strong>in</strong> source of <strong>in</strong>fection<br />

<strong>in</strong> all three target areas. CMD symptom<br />

severity was mild <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Coast <strong>and</strong><br />

Nyanza Prov<strong>in</strong>ces <strong>and</strong> more severe <strong>in</strong><br />

Western Prov<strong>in</strong>ce. SPVD <strong>in</strong>cidence<br />

ranged between 3% <strong>and</strong> 53% <strong>in</strong><br />

56<br />

Whiteflies <strong>and</strong> <strong>Whitefly</strong>-<strong>borne</strong> Viruses <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Tropics<br />

farmers’ fields. The disease was more<br />

prevalent <strong>in</strong> Western <strong>and</strong> Nyanza<br />

Prov<strong>in</strong>ces than <strong>in</strong> Coast Prov<strong>in</strong>ce.<br />

<strong>Whitefly</strong> parasitoids<br />

The survey identified two species of<br />

aphelenid parasitoids; 15 <strong>in</strong>dividual<br />

parasitoids were identified, compris<strong>in</strong>g<br />

13 Encarsia sophia (Girault <strong>and</strong> Dodd)<br />

<strong>and</strong> two Eretmocerus sp. Little is<br />

known, however, about <strong>the</strong> role of<br />

natural enemies <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> population<br />

dynamics of whiteflies <strong>in</strong> Kenya.<br />

Increased Socio-Economic<br />

Underst<strong>and</strong><strong>in</strong>g<br />

Farmers’ assessment of<br />

<strong>whitefly</strong>-related problems<br />

About half of <strong>the</strong> producers surveyed<br />

(52% of cassava farmers <strong>and</strong> 46% of<br />

sweetpotato farmers) were able to<br />

recognize whiteflies, although <strong>the</strong><br />

names <strong>the</strong>y used were non-specific. Of<br />

<strong>the</strong> farmers who recognized whiteflies<br />

on ei<strong>the</strong>r crop, 61% considered <strong>the</strong>m a<br />

production problem.<br />

Most cassava farmers (88%)<br />

recognized CMD as a disease of <strong>the</strong>ir<br />

crop, whilst only 58% of sweetpotato<br />

farmers recognized SPVD. The<br />

Table 1. Incidence (%) of cassava mosaic disease (CMD) <strong>and</strong> sweetpotato virus disease (SPVD),<br />

disease severity <strong>and</strong> <strong>whitefly</strong> abundance on cassava <strong>and</strong> sweetpotato <strong>in</strong> three prov<strong>in</strong>ces of<br />

Kenya, surveyed dur<strong>in</strong>g May <strong>and</strong> June 1998.<br />

Prov<strong>in</strong>ce Cassava a<br />

Sweetpotato a<br />

No. <strong>Whitefly</strong> CMD No. <strong>Whitefly</strong> SPVD<br />

fields counts<br />

<strong>Whitefly</strong> Cutt<strong>in</strong>g Total Severity<br />

fields counts <strong>in</strong>cidence<br />

<strong>in</strong>fection <strong>in</strong>fection <strong>in</strong>cidence<br />

Coast 17 2.9 19 (35.9) 37 56 2.3 15 0.5 0.4<br />

Western 15 0.2 14 (65.9) 71 85 2.9 18 2.5 6.9<br />

Nyanza 18 0.6 2 (2.3) 11 13 2.2 17 4.4 6.7<br />

Average - 1.2 11.7 (21.6) 39.7 51.3 2.5 - 2.5 4.7<br />

a. Figures are means for each prov<strong>in</strong>ce. <strong>Whitefly</strong> counts, <strong>whitefly</strong> abundance on cassava (number of<br />

whiteflies per top five leaves) <strong>and</strong> on sweetpotato (per m<strong>in</strong>ute count); <strong>whitefly</strong> <strong>in</strong>fection, figures <strong>in</strong><br />

paren<strong>the</strong>ses transformed to multiple <strong>in</strong>fection units to allow for multiple <strong>in</strong>fection (Gregory, P. H.<br />

1948. The multiple <strong>in</strong>fection transformation. Ann. Appl. Biol. 35:412-417); severity of disease<br />

measured on an ascend<strong>in</strong>g 1-5 scale, from low to severe.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!