Whitefly and whitefly-borne viruses in the tropics : Building a ... - cgiar
Whitefly and whitefly-borne viruses in the tropics : Building a ... - cgiar
Whitefly and whitefly-borne viruses in the tropics : Building a ... - cgiar
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Nigeria<br />
TMS 30572 (18.8%) <strong>and</strong> TMS 30555<br />
(2.5%). There was a marked difference<br />
<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>cidence of improved varieties<br />
between ecozones: <strong>the</strong>y were cultivated<br />
<strong>in</strong> 80% of sampled fields <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
transition forest but occurred <strong>in</strong> only<br />
about 30% of fields <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> ra<strong>in</strong>forest<br />
<strong>and</strong> wet savannah <strong>and</strong> were not<br />
recorded at all <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> dry savannah.<br />
There was a direct negative correlation<br />
between <strong>the</strong> frequency of cultivation of<br />
improved varieties <strong>and</strong> CMD <strong>in</strong>cidence.<br />
Farmers ranked cassava as <strong>the</strong>ir most<br />
profitable crop followed by maize, yam,<br />
sorghum (Sorghum bicolor [L.] Moench)<br />
<strong>and</strong> cowpea (Vigna unguiculata [L.]<br />
Walp.), <strong>in</strong> descend<strong>in</strong>g order. Of <strong>the</strong><br />
crops planted <strong>in</strong> association with<br />
cassava or <strong>in</strong> adjacent fields, cowpea is<br />
a known host plant of B. tabaci.<br />
Experimental data from o<strong>the</strong>r countries<br />
<strong>in</strong> Africa, however, show that <strong>the</strong> B.<br />
tabaci biotype occurr<strong>in</strong>g on cassava is<br />
more or less restricted to that crop<br />
(Burban et al., 1992; Legg et al., 1994).<br />
Average CMD <strong>in</strong>cidence ranged<br />
from 45% to 83% across ecozones, with<br />
cutt<strong>in</strong>gs provid<strong>in</strong>g by far <strong>the</strong> more<br />
important source of <strong>in</strong>fection (43% to<br />
83%) (Figure 2). The <strong>in</strong>cidence of<br />
<strong>whitefly</strong> <strong>in</strong>fection, transformed to allow<br />
for <strong>the</strong> effect of multiple <strong>in</strong>fection<br />
(Gregory, 1948), was low <strong>in</strong> each of <strong>the</strong><br />
ecozones. Among plants with disease,<br />
slight damage symptoms (score 2 on a<br />
five-po<strong>in</strong>t scale from no damage to<br />
severe damage) predom<strong>in</strong>ated<br />
(Figure 3). Plant damage severity varied<br />
little by ecozone. Moderate damage<br />
symptoms (score 3) were more<br />
pronounced <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> ra<strong>in</strong>forest (30% of<br />
plants) <strong>and</strong> wet savannah (20% of<br />
plants) than <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r ecozones,<br />
whilst serious (score 4) to severe<br />
(score 5) damage symptoms were<br />
negligible (Figure 3). Plants were less<br />
than 4 months old at <strong>the</strong> time of <strong>the</strong><br />
surveys, a growth stage dur<strong>in</strong>g which<br />
storage root formation <strong>and</strong> development<br />
is <strong>in</strong>itiated <strong>and</strong> root yield is particularly<br />
vulnerable to pest-<strong>in</strong>duced losses. Very<br />
few farmers (1.2%) reported total yield<br />
loss <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> first plant<strong>in</strong>g season but<br />
18.8% of farmers attributed losses of at<br />
least one quarter of <strong>the</strong>ir yield to <strong>the</strong><br />
disease. However, about 70% of <strong>the</strong><br />
farmers provided no yield loss<br />
estimates for <strong>the</strong> first or second crop.<br />
Percentage of plants<br />
with CMD symptoms<br />
100<br />
80<br />
60<br />
40<br />
20<br />
0<br />
Ra<strong>in</strong>forest<br />
Transition<br />
forest<br />
Wet<br />
savannah<br />
Dry<br />
savannah<br />
<strong>Whitefly</strong> <strong>in</strong>fection Cutt<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>fection<br />
Figure 2. Cassava mosaic disease (CMD)<br />
<strong>in</strong>cidence <strong>and</strong> source of <strong>in</strong>fection <strong>in</strong><br />
<strong>the</strong> ecozones of Nigeria.<br />
Percentage of plants with<br />
different CMD severities<br />
100<br />
90<br />
80<br />
70<br />
60<br />
50<br />
40<br />
30<br />
20<br />
10<br />
0<br />
Slight<br />
damage<br />
Ra<strong>in</strong>forest<br />
Wet savannah<br />
Moderate<br />
damage<br />
Serious<br />
damage<br />
Transition forest<br />
Dry savannah<br />
Figure 3. Cassava mosaic disease (CMD)<br />
damage severity <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> ecozones of<br />
Nigeria.<br />
Nearly all farmers reported that<br />
CMD occurred every year, while slightly<br />
more than half of <strong>the</strong>m confirmed that<br />
CMD was most severe dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> early<br />
growth stages of cassava. More than<br />
three-quarters of farmers (77.5%)<br />
reported that <strong>the</strong>y had received no<br />
technical <strong>in</strong>formation or assistance on<br />
37