23.07.2013 Views

Whitefly and whitefly-borne viruses in the tropics : Building a ... - cgiar

Whitefly and whitefly-borne viruses in the tropics : Building a ... - cgiar

Whitefly and whitefly-borne viruses in the tropics : Building a ... - cgiar

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Nigeria<br />

TMS 30572 (18.8%) <strong>and</strong> TMS 30555<br />

(2.5%). There was a marked difference<br />

<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>cidence of improved varieties<br />

between ecozones: <strong>the</strong>y were cultivated<br />

<strong>in</strong> 80% of sampled fields <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

transition forest but occurred <strong>in</strong> only<br />

about 30% of fields <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> ra<strong>in</strong>forest<br />

<strong>and</strong> wet savannah <strong>and</strong> were not<br />

recorded at all <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> dry savannah.<br />

There was a direct negative correlation<br />

between <strong>the</strong> frequency of cultivation of<br />

improved varieties <strong>and</strong> CMD <strong>in</strong>cidence.<br />

Farmers ranked cassava as <strong>the</strong>ir most<br />

profitable crop followed by maize, yam,<br />

sorghum (Sorghum bicolor [L.] Moench)<br />

<strong>and</strong> cowpea (Vigna unguiculata [L.]<br />

Walp.), <strong>in</strong> descend<strong>in</strong>g order. Of <strong>the</strong><br />

crops planted <strong>in</strong> association with<br />

cassava or <strong>in</strong> adjacent fields, cowpea is<br />

a known host plant of B. tabaci.<br />

Experimental data from o<strong>the</strong>r countries<br />

<strong>in</strong> Africa, however, show that <strong>the</strong> B.<br />

tabaci biotype occurr<strong>in</strong>g on cassava is<br />

more or less restricted to that crop<br />

(Burban et al., 1992; Legg et al., 1994).<br />

Average CMD <strong>in</strong>cidence ranged<br />

from 45% to 83% across ecozones, with<br />

cutt<strong>in</strong>gs provid<strong>in</strong>g by far <strong>the</strong> more<br />

important source of <strong>in</strong>fection (43% to<br />

83%) (Figure 2). The <strong>in</strong>cidence of<br />

<strong>whitefly</strong> <strong>in</strong>fection, transformed to allow<br />

for <strong>the</strong> effect of multiple <strong>in</strong>fection<br />

(Gregory, 1948), was low <strong>in</strong> each of <strong>the</strong><br />

ecozones. Among plants with disease,<br />

slight damage symptoms (score 2 on a<br />

five-po<strong>in</strong>t scale from no damage to<br />

severe damage) predom<strong>in</strong>ated<br />

(Figure 3). Plant damage severity varied<br />

little by ecozone. Moderate damage<br />

symptoms (score 3) were more<br />

pronounced <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> ra<strong>in</strong>forest (30% of<br />

plants) <strong>and</strong> wet savannah (20% of<br />

plants) than <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r ecozones,<br />

whilst serious (score 4) to severe<br />

(score 5) damage symptoms were<br />

negligible (Figure 3). Plants were less<br />

than 4 months old at <strong>the</strong> time of <strong>the</strong><br />

surveys, a growth stage dur<strong>in</strong>g which<br />

storage root formation <strong>and</strong> development<br />

is <strong>in</strong>itiated <strong>and</strong> root yield is particularly<br />

vulnerable to pest-<strong>in</strong>duced losses. Very<br />

few farmers (1.2%) reported total yield<br />

loss <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> first plant<strong>in</strong>g season but<br />

18.8% of farmers attributed losses of at<br />

least one quarter of <strong>the</strong>ir yield to <strong>the</strong><br />

disease. However, about 70% of <strong>the</strong><br />

farmers provided no yield loss<br />

estimates for <strong>the</strong> first or second crop.<br />

Percentage of plants<br />

with CMD symptoms<br />

100<br />

80<br />

60<br />

40<br />

20<br />

0<br />

Ra<strong>in</strong>forest<br />

Transition<br />

forest<br />

Wet<br />

savannah<br />

Dry<br />

savannah<br />

<strong>Whitefly</strong> <strong>in</strong>fection Cutt<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>fection<br />

Figure 2. Cassava mosaic disease (CMD)<br />

<strong>in</strong>cidence <strong>and</strong> source of <strong>in</strong>fection <strong>in</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> ecozones of Nigeria.<br />

Percentage of plants with<br />

different CMD severities<br />

100<br />

90<br />

80<br />

70<br />

60<br />

50<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

0<br />

Slight<br />

damage<br />

Ra<strong>in</strong>forest<br />

Wet savannah<br />

Moderate<br />

damage<br />

Serious<br />

damage<br />

Transition forest<br />

Dry savannah<br />

Figure 3. Cassava mosaic disease (CMD)<br />

damage severity <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> ecozones of<br />

Nigeria.<br />

Nearly all farmers reported that<br />

CMD occurred every year, while slightly<br />

more than half of <strong>the</strong>m confirmed that<br />

CMD was most severe dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> early<br />

growth stages of cassava. More than<br />

three-quarters of farmers (77.5%)<br />

reported that <strong>the</strong>y had received no<br />

technical <strong>in</strong>formation or assistance on<br />

37

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!