13.08.2013 Views

History of Northampton, Massachusetts, from its settlement in 1654;

History of Northampton, Massachusetts, from its settlement in 1654;

History of Northampton, Massachusetts, from its settlement in 1654;

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

nSfi.l NEW MEETING-HOUSE. 69<br />

"0 loads <strong>of</strong> poles," "2 loads <strong>of</strong> sprouts," &c. In connection<br />

witli the account for cartage, is another cover<strong>in</strong>g<br />

about one hundred seventy days' labor. The men were<br />

paid accord<strong>in</strong>g to the season <strong>of</strong> the year, some 4s. and<br />

others 5s. per day. They were undoubtedly employed <strong>in</strong><br />

fell<strong>in</strong>g the timber and prepar<strong>in</strong>g it for transportation.<br />

Most <strong>of</strong> the stone used <strong>in</strong> the foundation was brought <strong>from</strong><br />

the ''mounta<strong>in</strong>," probably <strong>from</strong> Mt. Tom, and <strong>from</strong> Rocky<br />

Hill. The prices paid for cart<strong>in</strong>g were <strong>from</strong> 7s. to 15s. ;<br />

generally <strong>from</strong> 10s. to l::^s. These materials were placed <strong>in</strong><br />

the highway <strong>in</strong> the vic<strong>in</strong>ity <strong>of</strong> the old meet<strong>in</strong>g-house, and<br />

there the timber was scored, hewed and framed, readj^ for<br />

rais<strong>in</strong>g. Stone for door-steps were purchased <strong>of</strong> Samuel<br />

Bartlett <strong>of</strong> Bolton, and he receiA^ed £10 for them.<br />

An Attempt to<br />

When the frame was nearly ready for rais-<br />

change t h e Location.<br />

{^g^ ^u attempt was made to change the<br />

i • p ji t t t .<br />

location or the house, and place it on<br />

the " Sand Hill between Moses Lyman's and Jonathan<br />

Wright's."^ But the proposition was negatived, and a<br />

vote passed that the new house should be set "partly on<br />

North West Side <strong>of</strong> the present Meet<strong>in</strong>g House, and j)artly<br />

<strong>from</strong> thence North Eastwardly, on the Ridge <strong>of</strong> Land whereon<br />

Edward Bakers fence now standeth."^ As some dis-<br />

satisfaction was still manifested concern<strong>in</strong>g the position <strong>of</strong><br />

the new build<strong>in</strong>g, the town two weeks afterwards reaffirmed<br />

the latter vote, and ordered " that the New meet<strong>in</strong>g House,<br />

when framed Shall be Set at y'^ place where it is fram<strong>in</strong>g."<br />

This build<strong>in</strong>g stood <strong>in</strong> the present highway, and the steeple,<br />

at the east end <strong>of</strong> it, was about on a l<strong>in</strong>e with the center<br />

doorway <strong>of</strong> the XJresent church edifice.<br />

1 From exist<strong>in</strong>g topography it is impossible to name with certa<strong>in</strong>ty this proposed<br />

site. In all probability it meant merely another position on Meet<strong>in</strong>g-House Hill, but<br />

no sand-hill is now <strong>in</strong> existence by means <strong>of</strong> which the place can be identified.<br />

Moses Lyman, grandson <strong>of</strong> John Lyman, owned at this time the northerly half <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Rev. Eleazar Mather property (now compris<strong>in</strong>g the southerly side <strong>of</strong> Ma<strong>in</strong> Street<br />

<strong>from</strong> Pleasant Street to th» Hampshire County Bank) and Jonathan Wright, grandson<br />

<strong>of</strong> Samuel Wright Sr.. was one <strong>of</strong> the owners <strong>of</strong> the lot at the corner <strong>of</strong> Ma<strong>in</strong><br />

and K<strong>in</strong>g Streets (First National Bank and Williston homestead), and it was probably<br />

at the extreme southeast extremity <strong>of</strong> Meetiug-House Hill, that it was desired<br />

to place the new structure, which is the only po<strong>in</strong>t that seems to satisfy the above<br />

conditions.<br />

2 From the above description it is probable that there was an error <strong>in</strong> the location<br />

<strong>of</strong> the second meet<strong>in</strong>g-house, and that it may have stood opposite the present<br />

entrance to Gothic Street, and not at that <strong>of</strong> Center Street as heret<strong>of</strong>ore stated.<br />

See vol. 1, p. 120.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!