13.08.2013 Views

History of Northampton, Massachusetts, from its settlement in 1654;

History of Northampton, Massachusetts, from its settlement in 1654;

History of Northampton, Massachusetts, from its settlement in 1654;

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

210 HISTORY OF NORTHAMPTON. [1T49.<br />

/ present difficulties, with respect to tlie admission <strong>of</strong> mem-<br />

/ bers <strong>in</strong>to the chnrch." This was not exactly the subject,<br />

at least not as thus stated, that the opponents <strong>of</strong> the pas-<br />

tor desired the church to act upon. A heated discussion<br />

followed, and pla<strong>in</strong> talk was <strong>in</strong>dulged <strong>in</strong> on both sides.<br />

F<strong>in</strong>ally the threat was made that if he refused to act as<br />

had been suggested, the prec<strong>in</strong>ct would warn a church<br />

meet<strong>in</strong>g without him. Mr. Edwards denied the right <strong>of</strong><br />

the prec<strong>in</strong>ct to dictate to the church the reasons for call<strong>in</strong>g<br />

it together. He argued that it was a bad precedent for the<br />

church to submit to the dictation <strong>of</strong> the prec<strong>in</strong>ct, and an<br />

unreasonable way <strong>of</strong> manag<strong>in</strong>g church affairs to br<strong>in</strong>g<br />

them firvst <strong>in</strong>to a prec<strong>in</strong>ct meet<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> which the pastor had<br />

no right to appear, and when decided upon, order the pastor<br />

to carry them out. By such a course, he said, church<br />

meet<strong>in</strong>gs would become a nullity, and the pastor a " cypher."<br />

He considered the proposition to apply to neighbor<strong>in</strong>g m<strong>in</strong>isters<br />

for advice concern<strong>in</strong>g the course the church should<br />

pursue, unreasonable, because all but one <strong>of</strong> them were<br />

opposed to his teach<strong>in</strong>gs. Notwithstand<strong>in</strong>g he consented<br />

to put to vote as desired by the parish, the question<br />

whether there was any dispute between the pastor and the<br />

people on the subject at issue. The vote which was largel}^<br />

<strong>in</strong> the affirmative, must have satisfied him on that po<strong>in</strong>t.<br />

Then <strong>in</strong>stead <strong>of</strong> comply<strong>in</strong>g with the suggestion <strong>of</strong> the pre-<br />

c<strong>in</strong>ct with reference to seek<strong>in</strong>g advice <strong>from</strong> neighbor<strong>in</strong>gm<strong>in</strong>isters,<br />

he <strong>in</strong>sisted that a mutual council shouhl be<br />

called to consider the general question <strong>in</strong> controversy and<br />

the best method <strong>of</strong> decid<strong>in</strong>g the difference. A long debate<br />

ensued and the meet<strong>in</strong>g adjourned without action for one<br />

week, hav<strong>in</strong>g first chosen a committee <strong>of</strong> five persons, with<br />

Major Seth Pomeroy as chairman, all members <strong>of</strong> the<br />

already exist<strong>in</strong>g prec<strong>in</strong>ct committee, to confer with tlie<br />

pastor.<br />

Major Pomeroy At the cousultatiou witli Mr. Edwards, his<br />

Sw<strong>in</strong>gs the arguuieuts SO far prevailed, that the entire<br />

committee, with the exception <strong>of</strong> <strong>its</strong> chairman,<br />

signed a report recommend<strong>in</strong>g a mutual council, on<br />

the terms proposed by the pastor. This was presented at<br />

the adjourned church meet<strong>in</strong>g. Major Pomeroy, however,<br />

was strongly opposed to this course. He contended that<br />

^ ^'^ '"^'

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!