13.08.2013 Views

History of Northampton, Massachusetts, from its settlement in 1654;

History of Northampton, Massachusetts, from its settlement in 1654;

History of Northampton, Massachusetts, from its settlement in 1654;

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

1788.] FEDERAL CONSTITUTION—MANUFACTURES. 525<br />

The Constitutional TliG body to wliicli tliis momeiitous question<br />

Convention. ^^s Submitted, was comjiosed <strong>of</strong> three hundred<br />

fifty members, among whom were<br />

many <strong>of</strong> the most prom<strong>in</strong>ent men <strong>in</strong> the State, men who<br />

had served <strong>in</strong> tlie federal congress, and had been members<br />

<strong>of</strong> the convention which framed the constitution <strong>of</strong> Massa-<br />

chusetts. Gov. Hancock presided. At the suggestion <strong>of</strong><br />

Caleb Strong <strong>of</strong> this town, it was voted<br />

'•that this convention, sensible how important it is that the great<br />

subject submitted to their determ<strong>in</strong>ation should be discussed and con-<br />

sidered with moderation, candor, and deliberation, will enter <strong>in</strong>to a free<br />

conversation on the several parts there<strong>of</strong>, by paragraphs, until every<br />

member shall have had opportunity to express his sentiments on the<br />

same ;<br />

after which the convention will consider and debate at large the<br />

question whether this convention will adopt and ratify the proposed<br />

constitution, before any vote is taken expressive <strong>of</strong> the sense <strong>of</strong> the<br />

convention upon the whole or any part there<strong>of</strong>.''<br />

This proposition <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Northampton</strong> delegate was fully<br />

carried out, and the convention consumed nearly a month<br />

<strong>in</strong> the consideration <strong>of</strong> the document. Many delegates<br />

were dissatisfied with it, and it was ratified by a meagre<br />

majority <strong>of</strong> n<strong>in</strong>eteen votes. Both the <strong>Northampton</strong> dele-<br />

gates voted <strong>in</strong> <strong>its</strong> favor.<br />

Regulations to be Ob- In March, 1789, the town undertook to<br />

served at Funerals, pegulate the method <strong>of</strong> couduct<strong>in</strong>g fu-<br />

neral processions. The warrant specified<br />

a " more orderly method <strong>of</strong> walk<strong>in</strong>g to funerals." A com-<br />

mittee was entrusted with the consideration <strong>of</strong> the matter,<br />

who reported <strong>in</strong> May —<br />

:<br />

" Whereas it is the op<strong>in</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> this Town that funerals ought to be<br />

conducted with great decency and decorum <strong>in</strong> order to impress on the<br />

m<strong>in</strong>ds <strong>of</strong> the ris<strong>in</strong>g & risen generation the importance <strong>of</strong> the awful<br />

solemnity, and to render the House <strong>of</strong> mourn<strong>in</strong>g better than the House<br />

<strong>of</strong> feast<strong>in</strong>g. Be it, therefore recommended to all the Inhabitants <strong>of</strong> this<br />

Town to observe the follow<strong>in</strong>g regulations at funerals —<br />

:<br />

" 1. That the relations <strong>of</strong> the deceased follow next the corse two<br />

& two.<br />

•'2. If the deceased was a male person, the males are to follow next<br />

the mourners, two & two,—and the women after them, two & two—but<br />

if the deceased was a woman, then the women are to follow next the<br />

moiirners. & the men after them.<br />

'•3. Those on Horseback are to fall <strong>in</strong> after the foot folks. Horses<br />

two & two. and the Carriages are to follow <strong>in</strong> the rear <strong>of</strong> the proces-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!