13.08.2013 Views

History of Northampton, Massachusetts, from its settlement in 1654;

History of Northampton, Massachusetts, from its settlement in 1654;

History of Northampton, Massachusetts, from its settlement in 1654;

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

92 HISTORY OF NORTHAMPTON. [1743.<br />

tor's fuel till "next Tuesday," and <strong>in</strong> case it was not then<br />

forthcom<strong>in</strong>g, the whole amount needed, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g what<br />

had already been furnished, was to be paid for <strong>from</strong> the<br />

town rate. In the face <strong>of</strong> such a vote it seems improbable<br />

that the quantity <strong>of</strong> wood furnished on the date mentioned<br />

would have been very large.<br />

Lower Grist-3iiii In 1T42, permission was granted to Samuel<br />

'^'ant. and Moses K<strong>in</strong>gsley and Samuel Marshall<br />

to set up a Grist-Mill on Mill River, aga<strong>in</strong>st<br />

the rear <strong>of</strong> their home lots, if they would build it with<strong>in</strong><br />

two years. This location was on or near the site <strong>of</strong> the present<br />

lower mil] (Lamb's wire mill), just above the South<br />

Street Boulevard Bridge. The K<strong>in</strong>gsleys lived on the south<br />

side <strong>of</strong> the river and Marshall on the north. As the mill<br />

was not completed with<strong>in</strong> the time specified, the town extended<br />

the limit and gave permission to raise the dam to<br />

the height <strong>of</strong> seven feet.<br />

Lawsuit about the Tliis led to a couteutiou with the owners <strong>of</strong><br />

^i'^- the upper mill (now Maynard's Hoe Shop)<br />

<strong>in</strong> which the town became <strong>in</strong>volved, and<br />

which was cont<strong>in</strong>ued for more than thirty years. The mill<br />

was built, and had been <strong>in</strong> operation some fifteen years,<br />

when it was shut down and for some time rema<strong>in</strong>ed "unimproved,"<br />

on account <strong>of</strong> a suit for damages brought by<br />

the owners <strong>of</strong> the upper mill, aga<strong>in</strong>st the K<strong>in</strong>gsleys. A<br />

committee was appo<strong>in</strong>ted by the town to <strong>in</strong>vestigate, and<br />

on the strength <strong>of</strong> their report, it was voted to '<br />

' save the<br />

K<strong>in</strong>gsleys harmless aga<strong>in</strong>st all actions and demands <strong>of</strong> the<br />

upper mill proprietors, provided they keep their mill <strong>in</strong><br />

order and do not raise the water to a depth <strong>of</strong> over seven<br />

feet." In 17(35, another suit was brought aga<strong>in</strong>st the owners<br />

<strong>of</strong> the lower mills, on account <strong>of</strong> alleged damages<br />

caused by the flood <strong>of</strong> the previous year, which had set the<br />

water back so as to obstruct the work<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> the old mill.<br />

Arbitration was proposed but the K<strong>in</strong>gsleys refused to<br />

al)ide by it, claim<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>demnity <strong>from</strong> the town. The case<br />

went before the court, and the K<strong>in</strong>gsleys recovered. In<br />

17GG, the town paid the amount awarded by the court and<br />

appo<strong>in</strong>ted a committee to arrange matters between the contend<strong>in</strong>g<br />

parties. This committee was <strong>in</strong>structed to fix an

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!