13.08.2013 Views

History of Northampton, Massachusetts, from its settlement in 1654;

History of Northampton, Massachusetts, from its settlement in 1654;

History of Northampton, Massachusetts, from its settlement in 1654;

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

426 HISTORY OF NORTHAMPTON. [1779.<br />

lature submitted the question <strong>of</strong> call<strong>in</strong>g sucli a convention<br />

to the towns. It came up at the May meet<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> this form :<br />

"Whether the Town will impower their Representatives<br />

for the next year to vote for the Call<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> a State Convention,"<br />

if a majority <strong>of</strong> the people should so decide. This<br />

was a matter <strong>of</strong> no slight importance, and elicited not a<br />

little discussion. The debate upon it was cont<strong>in</strong>ued<br />

throughout an entire day, when the f<strong>in</strong>al vote stood sixty<br />

<strong>in</strong> the affirmative to ten <strong>in</strong> the negative ; a small meet<strong>in</strong>g<br />

compared with that at which the question <strong>of</strong> call<strong>in</strong>g a new<br />

m<strong>in</strong>ister was decided. The vote <strong>in</strong>structed the representatives<br />

to favor the call<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> such a convention, "provided<br />

it shall appear to them on exam<strong>in</strong>ation that a major part<br />

<strong>of</strong> the people present & Vot<strong>in</strong>g at the meet<strong>in</strong>gs called <strong>in</strong><br />

the manner and for the purposes afores'd shall have<br />

answered the first Question <strong>in</strong> the affirmative." The first<br />

question evidently was whether "a new constitution and<br />

form <strong>of</strong> Government should be made," at this time.<br />

The Convention The result was that the majority <strong>of</strong> the<br />

'^oted. towns favored the proposition, though<br />

nearly one third <strong>of</strong> them neglected to make<br />

any return. The General Court issued precepts for the<br />

choice <strong>of</strong> delegates, and a meet<strong>in</strong>g was held on the 9*'' <strong>of</strong><br />

August, to elect them. Each town was authorized to send<br />

one or more delegates, "but the meet<strong>in</strong>g be<strong>in</strong>g th<strong>in</strong> the<br />

town voted to suspend further action until the people<br />

should be more generally collected." When the seats were<br />

better filled, the decision was reached to send two delegates,<br />

and Mr. Ephraim Wright and Caleb Strong Esq. were<br />

chosen.<br />

Its First Session. The couventiou assembled at Cambridge,<br />

Sept. V\ A committee was chosen to draft<br />

a constitution, and after a session <strong>of</strong> about a week the convention<br />

adjourned till October. When it reconvened, the<br />

committee was not ready to report, and after two weeks a<br />

further adjournment was had till January <strong>of</strong> the succeed<strong>in</strong>g<br />

year. Both <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Northampton</strong> delegates were present<br />

at the September session. Caleb Strong received £106.10.8<br />

and Mr. Wright £139.13 <strong>from</strong> the town for their expenses.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!