13.08.2013 Views

History of Northampton, Massachusetts, from its settlement in 1654;

History of Northampton, Massachusetts, from its settlement in 1654;

History of Northampton, Massachusetts, from its settlement in 1654;

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

1728.] REV. SOLOMON STODDARD. 57<br />

prescribed the method <strong>of</strong> admitt<strong>in</strong>g persons to full membership,<br />

and the records conta<strong>in</strong> no <strong>in</strong>timation that it had<br />

ever been changed. Neither is there anyth<strong>in</strong>g to be found<br />

<strong>in</strong> them authoriz<strong>in</strong>g the statement that Mr. Stoddard<br />

adopted a form <strong>of</strong> confession <strong>in</strong> accordance with his own<br />

peculiar views.<br />

The Reform<strong>in</strong>g Synod <strong>of</strong> 1679, declared that persons<br />

must make pr<strong>of</strong>ession <strong>of</strong> faith and repentance <strong>in</strong> order to<br />

ga<strong>in</strong> full admission <strong>in</strong>to the church, and Mr. Stoddard adm<strong>its</strong><br />

that" he voted <strong>in</strong> <strong>its</strong> favor. Though the doctr<strong>in</strong>e advocated<br />

by him was only partially discussed <strong>in</strong> that assembly,<br />

the <strong>in</strong>ference is undoubted that notwithstand<strong>in</strong>g the admission<br />

to partake <strong>of</strong> the holy rite <strong>of</strong> communion, which<br />

was then practiced <strong>in</strong> other churches if not <strong>in</strong> <strong>Northampton</strong>,<br />

candidates must also make a pr<strong>of</strong>ession <strong>of</strong> faith and<br />

repentance. Mr. Stoddard was not so <strong>in</strong>consistent as to<br />

preach one doctr<strong>in</strong>e and practice another.<br />

The Scheme Pro- No reliable data are at hand sufficient to demuigated.<br />

temiiue when this method was <strong>in</strong>troduced<br />

here. There is a probability, however, that<br />

it was <strong>in</strong> practice <strong>in</strong> <strong>Northampton</strong> as early as 1077, with<strong>in</strong><br />

five years <strong>of</strong> the <strong>settlement</strong> <strong>of</strong> the second m<strong>in</strong>ister. In<br />

that year. Increase Mather, <strong>in</strong> an election sermon, denounced<br />

the prevalence <strong>of</strong> " Stoddardeanism " among the<br />

clergy. ^ Two years later Mr. Stoddard seems to have up-<br />

held this theory at the session <strong>of</strong> the Reform<strong>in</strong>g Synod, as<br />

far as he was permitted. It was not. however, till the<br />

open<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> the eighteenth century that he alluded to the<br />

subject <strong>in</strong> the pulpit. The public discussion <strong>of</strong> the question<br />

between Increase and Cotton Mather on one side, and<br />

Mr. Stoddard on the other, commenced <strong>in</strong> the year 1700,<br />

though the sermon <strong>in</strong> which the latter fully expla<strong>in</strong>ed his<br />

views was not delivered till 1704, nor published till three<br />

years later. Books, pamphlets, sermons followed each<br />

other <strong>in</strong> quick succession for eight or n<strong>in</strong>e years. In 1709,<br />

Mr. Stoddard published the f<strong>in</strong>al v<strong>in</strong>dication <strong>of</strong> his system<br />

<strong>in</strong> a sermon entitled, " An Appeal to the Learned, Be<strong>in</strong>g a<br />

V<strong>in</strong>dication <strong>of</strong> the Right <strong>of</strong> Visible Sa<strong>in</strong>ts to the Lord's<br />

Supper, Though they be destitute <strong>of</strong> a Sav<strong>in</strong>g Work <strong>of</strong><br />

1 Walker's Creeds and Platforms <strong>of</strong> Congregatioualism, p. 880.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!