13.08.2013 Views

History of Northampton, Massachusetts, from its settlement in 1654;

History of Northampton, Massachusetts, from its settlement in 1654;

History of Northampton, Massachusetts, from its settlement in 1654;

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

478 HISTORY OF NORTHAMPTON. [1786.<br />

Jonathan Ashley, Samuel Field and Jonas Baker." These<br />

petitioners were all residents <strong>of</strong> towns <strong>in</strong> the northern part<br />

<strong>of</strong> the county. Several <strong>of</strong> them belonged <strong>in</strong> Deerfield,<br />

and the rest <strong>in</strong> contiguous towns. The Legislature referred<br />

the matter to the several towns <strong>in</strong> the county, request<strong>in</strong>g<br />

them " to give their reasons why the county should not be<br />

divided agreeably to said petition." The question came<br />

before the town <strong>of</strong> <strong>Northampton</strong>, at a meet<strong>in</strong>g held <strong>in</strong><br />

May, when the town not only voted aga<strong>in</strong>st it, but <strong>in</strong>-<br />

structed <strong>its</strong> representatives " to use their Influence <strong>in</strong> the<br />

Gen'l Court to prevent any such Division <strong>of</strong> the County."<br />

The proposition was to form a new county <strong>from</strong> the<br />

northeastern portion <strong>of</strong> Hampshire and the northwestern<br />

part <strong>of</strong> Worcester County. The response <strong>from</strong> the towns<br />

was decidedly aga<strong>in</strong>st any such division, and noth<strong>in</strong>g<br />

further was done at that time. But the design was not<br />

abandoned. It was pressed aga<strong>in</strong> the next year, but without<br />

success.<br />

A Convention Consid- In May, 1786, a convention met at Haters<br />

the subject. Q.e\d for the purpose <strong>of</strong> discuss<strong>in</strong>g this<br />

question, <strong>in</strong> which forty-one towns were<br />

represented. Among the reasons advanced <strong>in</strong> favor <strong>of</strong> the<br />

proposition was the <strong>in</strong>convenience <strong>of</strong> reach<strong>in</strong>g the towns <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>Northampton</strong> and Spr<strong>in</strong>gfield, where all the courts were<br />

held. The county then extended <strong>from</strong> the Vermont l<strong>in</strong>e<br />

on the north to that <strong>of</strong> Connecticut on the south, and the<br />

courts were held and all bus<strong>in</strong>ess transacted below the center<br />

<strong>of</strong> the county. The convention voted twenty-two<br />

aga<strong>in</strong>st and n<strong>in</strong>eteen <strong>in</strong> favor <strong>of</strong> a division. A vote to cen-<br />

ter the courts showed twenty-three aga<strong>in</strong>st and eighteen <strong>in</strong><br />

favor <strong>of</strong> such a proposition. The suggestion that two<br />

courts should be held at Deerfield, received twenty-four<br />

votes <strong>in</strong> <strong>its</strong> favor and seventeen aga<strong>in</strong>st. Noth<strong>in</strong>g, however,<br />

was accomplished, and many years elapsed before the<br />

county was divided.<br />

Pews <strong>in</strong> the Meet<strong>in</strong>g- This year saw the last <strong>of</strong> the benches <strong>in</strong><br />

^o^^^- the meet<strong>in</strong>g-house. All the long seats<br />

places.<br />

were taken out, and pews erected <strong>in</strong> their

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!