13.08.2013 Views

History of Northampton, Massachusetts, from its settlement in 1654;

History of Northampton, Massachusetts, from its settlement in 1654;

History of Northampton, Massachusetts, from its settlement in 1654;

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

313 HISTORY OF NORTHAMPTON. [1761.<br />

Disputed Land <strong>in</strong> A Special meet<strong>in</strong>g was called to <strong>in</strong>quire <strong>in</strong>to<br />

Middle Meadow. \;]^q ownership <strong>of</strong> Certa<strong>in</strong> lands <strong>in</strong> Middle<br />

Meadow. A committee reported that a considerable<br />

part <strong>of</strong> them belonged to the town. Thereupon<br />

a vote was passed to make the title good. From this action<br />

grew a long drawn out law suit, which was not settled till<br />

1764, and then matters seem to have been left about as they<br />

were when the suit was commenced. Apparently a test<br />

case was made with the heirs <strong>of</strong> Jonathan Hunt, and <strong>in</strong><br />

the course <strong>of</strong> a couple <strong>of</strong> years the town expended not far<br />

<strong>from</strong> £88 <strong>in</strong> the litigation. <strong>Northampton</strong> lost the case be-<br />

fore the lower court, and appealed to the Superior Court.<br />

In 17fi4, the town decided that it " would become non<br />

suit if the Hunts would agree to be defaulted." Appar-<br />

ently both sides were ready to compromise on that basis,<br />

for at the September session <strong>of</strong> the higher court neither<br />

party put <strong>in</strong> an appearance.<br />

Attempt to make Hardly had the new County <strong>of</strong> Berkshire<br />

<strong>Northampton</strong> the been established, when a movement was<br />

"^^<br />

commenced to make <strong>Northampton</strong> the shiretown<br />

<strong>of</strong> Old Hampshire, <strong>in</strong>stead <strong>of</strong> Spr<strong>in</strong>gfield. A peti-<br />

tion signed by Timothy Dwiglit <strong>of</strong> <strong>Northampton</strong> and Oliver<br />

Partridge <strong>of</strong> Hatfield, <strong>in</strong> which it was claimed that<br />

<strong>Northampton</strong> was much more central than Spr<strong>in</strong>gfield, was<br />

presented to the Legislature <strong>in</strong> April, 1761. <strong>Northampton</strong><br />

suj)plemented this petition by another <strong>in</strong> the follow<strong>in</strong>g<br />

May, <strong>in</strong>struct<strong>in</strong>g a committee to "procure & Send Some<br />

proper person an Agent to Boston to prosecute the aff'air."<br />

Col. Timothy Dwight was delegated to perform this duty,<br />

and there rema<strong>in</strong>s on file an order on the town treasurer,<br />

signed by the three selectmen to pay him "three £ and<br />

seven pence one fifth part <strong>of</strong> a penny <strong>in</strong> full satisfaction for<br />

the like sum paid at Boston by him <strong>in</strong> and about the affair<br />

<strong>of</strong> the town <strong>of</strong> <strong>Northampton</strong>'s application to the Genl<br />

Court to be constituted the Shire Town <strong>of</strong> the county <strong>of</strong><br />

Hampshire." Some towns <strong>in</strong> the northern part <strong>of</strong> the<br />

county petitioned <strong>in</strong> favor <strong>of</strong> <strong>Northampton</strong>, and others <strong>in</strong><br />

favor <strong>of</strong> Hadley, while those <strong>in</strong> the southern portion opposed<br />

any change. In January <strong>of</strong> the follow<strong>in</strong>g year,<br />

twenty-one towns <strong>in</strong> the northern half <strong>of</strong> the county peti-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!