13.08.2013 Views

History of Northampton, Massachusetts, from its settlement in 1654;

History of Northampton, Massachusetts, from its settlement in 1654;

History of Northampton, Massachusetts, from its settlement in 1654;

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

214 HISTORY OF NORTHAMPTON. [1749.<br />

ter with the m<strong>in</strong>isters <strong>of</strong> the association. The question<br />

was long debated and various suggestions were <strong>of</strong>fered by<br />

both sides, but the meet<strong>in</strong>g adjourned without action. The<br />

next day, after further discussion, the report <strong>of</strong> the committee<br />

was substantially adopted. It was decided that a<br />

council <strong>from</strong> five <strong>of</strong> the seven nearest churches should be<br />

<strong>in</strong>vited, and steps were taken to present the case properly,<br />

on behalf <strong>of</strong> the church. Hon. Ebenezer Pomeroy, Lieut.<br />

Noah Wright and Joseph Hawley were chosen agents for<br />

that purpose, but Mr. Hawley decl<strong>in</strong>ed to serve. Aga<strong>in</strong><br />

the church refused to observe the Sacrament <strong>of</strong> the Lord's<br />

Supper.<br />

Prec<strong>in</strong>ct Meet<strong>in</strong>gs. While the church was labor<strong>in</strong>g with the<br />

problem, the prec<strong>in</strong>ct met <strong>from</strong> time to<br />

time, but transacted no bus<strong>in</strong>ess. On the 18^'' <strong>of</strong> December,<br />

a vote was passed to provide for the '"enterta<strong>in</strong>ment<br />

<strong>of</strong> the Council," to pay all the expenses and to engage<br />

Major Lyman [Hon Ph<strong>in</strong>ehas Lyman] <strong>of</strong> Suffield, to assist<br />

<strong>in</strong> present<strong>in</strong>g the case. Major Seth Pomeroy was author-<br />

ized to wait on Mr. Lyman^ and "obta<strong>in</strong> his services at a<br />

suitable reward."<br />

Meet<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> the On the 26*'' the council met. It was comcouncii.<br />

posed <strong>of</strong> Rev. Chester Williams <strong>of</strong> Hadley,<br />

Rev. Timoth}^ Woodbridge <strong>of</strong> Hatfield,<br />

Rev. Edward Bill<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>of</strong> Cold Spr<strong>in</strong>g (Belchertown), and<br />

Rev. Jonathan Judd <strong>of</strong> Southampton. The church <strong>in</strong><br />

Sunderland, which had been <strong>in</strong>vited, was not represented.<br />

The names <strong>of</strong> the delegates, with tlie exception <strong>of</strong> that <strong>of</strong><br />

Dea. Strong <strong>of</strong> Southampton, have not been preserved.<br />

Mr. Edward-s Argues Mr. Edwards spoke <strong>in</strong> his own behalf behis<br />

Case. fore the council. The ma<strong>in</strong> questions he<br />

presented were, whether it would "be<br />

worth the while to use any endeavors for an accommoda-<br />

tion," wdietlier the parties were "now ripe for a separation,"<br />

" whether it was for any th<strong>in</strong>g blame-worthy and<br />

scandalous <strong>in</strong> the pastor, which rendered him unfit for the<br />

m<strong>in</strong>istry, and worthy to be dismissed <strong>from</strong> it," and whether<br />

1 In Dwighfs Life <strong>of</strong> Edwards, p. 341, it is stated that Mr. Lyman "decl<strong>in</strong>ed the<br />

proposed service."

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!